inTest Corporation (INTT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
inTest Corporation (INTT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($47.69 Million) in one year. See INTT financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
inTest Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for inTest Corporation across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does inTest Corporation generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for inTest Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for inTest Corporation. Check cash flow quality index of inTest Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $7.32 Million | $47.69 Million | ▲ +110.7% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $3.82 Million | $52.50 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $16.20 Million | $38.55 Million | ▲ +1465.1% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-1.39 Million | $45.11 Million | ▼ -113.9% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $10.84 Million | $49.08 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $3.25 Million | $17.28 Million | ▲ +133.3% |
| 2019 | -0.56x | $-8.40 Million | $14.88 Million | ▼ -225.3% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $10.96 Million | $24.31 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2017 | 0.31x | $7.24 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2016 | 0.85x | $4.29 Million | $5.06 Million | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2015 | 0.86x | $3.50 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $5.13 Million | $4.37 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2013 | 0.87x | $3.77 Million | $4.33 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2012 | 1.45x | $6.64 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2011 | 1.55x | $7.82 Million | $5.04 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2010 | 1.22x | $6.45 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +290.0% |
| 2009 | -0.64x | $-4.19 Million | $6.55 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2008 | -0.42x | $-2.93 Million | $7.03 Million | ▼ -332.7% |
| 2007 | -0.10x | $-600.00K | $6.22 Million | ▼ -113.6% |
| 2006 | 0.71x | $6.36 Million | $8.94 Million | ▲ +1340.8% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $398.00K | $8.06 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $3.96 Million | $7.05 Million | ▲ +400.6% |
| 2003 | -0.19x | $-1.38 Million | $7.39 Million | ▼ -138.9% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $2.52 Million | $5.22 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2001 | 0.86x | $3.94 Million | $4.56 Million | ▲ +461.5% |
| 2000 | -0.24x | $-1.94 Million | $8.13 Million | ▼ -130.2% |
| 1999 | 0.79x | $4.90 Million | $6.20 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 1998 | 0.80x | $1.60 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 1997 | 0.79x | $2.60 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 1996 | 1.96x | $5.50 Million | $2.80 Million | — |