inTest Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
inTest Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. inTest Corporation (INTT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($47.69 Million) in one year. Check INTT cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of inTest Corporation (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of inTest Corporation from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for inTest Corporation across 30 annual periods. Check INTT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
inTest Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
inTest Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for inTest Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see inTest Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $7.32 Million | $47.69 Million | ▲ +110.7% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $3.82 Million | $52.50 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $16.20 Million | $38.55 Million | ▲ +1465.1% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-1.39 Million | $45.11 Million | ▼ -113.9% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $10.84 Million | $49.08 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $3.25 Million | $17.28 Million | ▲ +133.3% |
| 2019 | -0.56x | $-8.40 Million | $14.88 Million | ▼ -225.3% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $10.96 Million | $24.31 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2017 | 0.31x | $7.24 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2016 | 0.85x | $4.29 Million | $5.06 Million | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2015 | 0.86x | $3.50 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $5.13 Million | $4.37 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2013 | 0.87x | $3.77 Million | $4.33 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2012 | 1.45x | $6.64 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2011 | 1.55x | $7.82 Million | $5.04 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2010 | 1.22x | $6.45 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +290.0% |
| 2009 | -0.64x | $-4.19 Million | $6.55 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2008 | -0.42x | $-2.93 Million | $7.03 Million | ▼ -332.7% |
| 2007 | -0.10x | $-600.00K | $6.22 Million | ▼ -113.6% |
| 2006 | 0.71x | $6.36 Million | $8.94 Million | ▲ +1340.8% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $398.00K | $8.06 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $3.96 Million | $7.05 Million | ▲ +400.6% |
| 2003 | -0.19x | $-1.38 Million | $7.39 Million | ▼ -138.9% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $2.52 Million | $5.22 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2001 | 0.86x | $3.94 Million | $4.56 Million | ▲ +461.5% |
| 2000 | -0.24x | $-1.94 Million | $8.13 Million | ▼ -130.2% |
| 1999 | 0.79x | $4.90 Million | $6.20 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 1998 | 0.80x | $1.60 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 1997 | 0.79x | $2.60 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 1996 | 1.96x | $5.50 Million | $2.80 Million | — |