LGL Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LGL Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. LGL Group Inc (LGL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.34x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $501.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.49 Million) in one year. Check LGL cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of LGL Group Inc (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of LGL Group Inc from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for LGL Group Inc across 40 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of LGL Group Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
LGL Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
LGL Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LGL Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LGL Group Inc (LGL) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $70.00K | $1.21 Million | ▼ -87.4% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $874.00K | $1.91 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $385.00K | $1.19 Million | ▲ +152.6% |
| 2022 | -0.62x | $-817.00K | $1.33 Million | ▼ -378.5% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $1.35 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2020 | 0.87x | $3.19 Million | $3.69 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2019 | 0.60x | $2.67 Million | $4.44 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2018 | 0.60x | $1.66 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +132.1% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $681.00K | $2.63 Million | ▲ +156.9% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $278.00K | $2.75 Million | ▼ -69.6% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $689.00K | $2.08 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 2014 | -0.43x | $-1.30 Million | $3.02 Million | ▼ -191.5% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | $-664.00K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-469.00K | $4.98 Million | ▼ -127.7% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | $2.32 Million | $6.83 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2010 | 1.09x | $5.50 Million | $5.03 Million | ▲ +1541.9% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $637.00K | $9.56 Million | ▲ +180.0% |
| 2008 | -0.08x | $-943.00K | $11.32 Million | ▼ -143.8% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | $-359.00K | $10.51 Million | ▲ +73.8% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-1.85 Million | $14.25 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $2.28 Million | $17.98 Million | ▲ +258.9% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-1.91 Million | $23.89 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-544.00K | $11.99 Million | ▼ -115.8% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $3.59 Million | $12.50 Million | ▲ +103.6% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $5.55 Million | $39.30 Million | ▲ +690.5% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-3.43 Million | $143.57 Million | ▼ -134.3% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $12.85 Million | $184.32 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $35.00 Million | $425.70 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $24.10 Million | $373.30 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $29.10 Million | $340.40 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $27.20 Million | $253.90 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $14.60 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $9.80 Million | $96.60 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $6.90 Million | $86.50 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $4.20 Million | $86.20 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $6.00 Million | $84.20 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 1989 | 0.04x | $4.00 Million | $91.60 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1988 | 0.05x | $2.50 Million | $45.70 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 1986 | 0.03x | $1.30 Million | $49.00 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 1985 | 0.13x | $700.00K | $5.50 Million | — |