LGL Group Inc (LGL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LGL Group Inc (LGL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.34x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $501.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.49 Million) in one year. See LGL financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LGL Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LGL Group Inc across 40 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of LGL Group Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LGL Group Inc (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LGL Group Inc. Check LGL operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $70.00K | $1.21 Million | ▼ -87.4% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $874.00K | $1.91 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $385.00K | $1.19 Million | ▲ +152.6% |
| 2022 | -0.62x | $-817.00K | $1.33 Million | ▼ -378.5% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $1.35 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2020 | 0.87x | $3.19 Million | $3.69 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2019 | 0.60x | $2.67 Million | $4.44 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2018 | 0.60x | $1.66 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +132.1% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $681.00K | $2.63 Million | ▲ +156.9% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $278.00K | $2.75 Million | ▼ -69.6% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $689.00K | $2.08 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 2014 | -0.43x | $-1.30 Million | $3.02 Million | ▼ -191.5% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | $-664.00K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-469.00K | $4.98 Million | ▼ -127.7% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | $2.32 Million | $6.83 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2010 | 1.09x | $5.50 Million | $5.03 Million | ▲ +1541.9% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $637.00K | $9.56 Million | ▲ +180.0% |
| 2008 | -0.08x | $-943.00K | $11.32 Million | ▼ -143.8% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | $-359.00K | $10.51 Million | ▲ +73.8% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-1.85 Million | $14.25 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $2.28 Million | $17.98 Million | ▲ +258.9% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-1.91 Million | $23.89 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-544.00K | $11.99 Million | ▼ -115.8% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $3.59 Million | $12.50 Million | ▲ +103.6% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $5.55 Million | $39.30 Million | ▲ +690.5% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-3.43 Million | $143.57 Million | ▼ -134.3% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $12.85 Million | $184.32 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $35.00 Million | $425.70 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $24.10 Million | $373.30 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $29.10 Million | $340.40 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $27.20 Million | $253.90 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $14.60 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $9.80 Million | $96.60 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $6.90 Million | $86.50 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $4.20 Million | $86.20 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $6.00 Million | $84.20 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 1989 | 0.04x | $4.00 Million | $91.60 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1988 | 0.05x | $2.50 Million | $45.70 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 1986 | 0.03x | $1.30 Million | $49.00 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 1985 | 0.13x | $700.00K | $5.50 Million | — |