LGL Group Inc (LGL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LGL Group Inc (LGL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.34x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $501.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.49 Million) in one year. See LGL Group Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LGL Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LGL Group Inc across 40 annual periods. Also explore LGL net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LGL Group Inc (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LGL Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LGL Group Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $70.00K | $1.21 Million | ▼ -87.4% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $874.00K | $1.91 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $385.00K | $1.19 Million | ▲ +152.6% |
| 2022 | -0.62x | $-817.00K | $1.33 Million | ▼ -378.5% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | $1.35 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2020 | 0.87x | $3.19 Million | $3.69 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2019 | 0.60x | $2.67 Million | $4.44 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2018 | 0.60x | $1.66 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +132.1% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $681.00K | $2.63 Million | ▲ +156.9% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $278.00K | $2.75 Million | ▼ -69.6% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $689.00K | $2.08 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 2014 | -0.43x | $-1.30 Million | $3.02 Million | ▼ -191.5% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | $-664.00K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-469.00K | $4.98 Million | ▼ -127.7% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | $2.32 Million | $6.83 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2010 | 1.09x | $5.50 Million | $5.03 Million | ▲ +1541.9% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $637.00K | $9.56 Million | ▲ +180.0% |
| 2008 | -0.08x | $-943.00K | $11.32 Million | ▼ -143.8% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | $-359.00K | $10.51 Million | ▲ +73.8% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-1.85 Million | $14.25 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $2.28 Million | $17.98 Million | ▲ +258.9% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-1.91 Million | $23.89 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-544.00K | $11.99 Million | ▼ -115.8% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $3.59 Million | $12.50 Million | ▲ +103.6% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $5.55 Million | $39.30 Million | ▲ +690.5% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-3.43 Million | $143.57 Million | ▼ -134.3% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $12.85 Million | $184.32 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $35.00 Million | $425.70 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $24.10 Million | $373.30 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $29.10 Million | $340.40 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $27.20 Million | $253.90 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $14.60 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $9.80 Million | $96.60 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $6.90 Million | $86.50 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $4.20 Million | $86.20 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $6.00 Million | $84.20 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 1989 | 0.04x | $4.00 Million | $91.60 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 1988 | 0.05x | $2.50 Million | $45.70 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 1986 | 0.03x | $1.30 Million | $49.00 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 1985 | 0.13x | $700.00K | $5.50 Million | — |