Milestone Scientific Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Milestone Scientific cash flow-to-debt ratio. Milestone Scientific (MLSS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $81.78K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.94 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Milestone Scientific to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Milestone Scientific (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Milestone Scientific from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Milestone Scientific across 29 annual periods. Check MLSS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Milestone Scientific Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Milestone Scientific cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Milestone Scientific. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MLSS operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.74x | $-2.92 Million | $3.96 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2023 | -1.59x | $-5.33 Million | $3.36 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2022 | -1.63x | $-6.03 Million | $3.70 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2021 | -1.12x | $-4.02 Million | $3.59 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2020 | -2.02x | $-6.98 Million | $3.46 Million | ▼ -458.4% |
| 2019 | -0.36x | $-1.78 Million | $4.93 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2018 | -0.33x | $-1.63 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -120.9% |
| 2017 | -0.15x | $-1.23 Million | $8.13 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2016 | -1.08x | $-5.40 Million | $5.01 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2015 | -0.81x | $-2.95 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -622.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $376.94K | $2.44 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2013 | 0.50x | $1.26 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +3819.1% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-49.72K | $3.72 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-570.73K | $5.06 Million | ▼ -64.3% |
| 2010 | -0.07x | $-293.78K | $4.28 Million | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $402.95K | $2.21 Million | ▲ +224.3% |
| 2008 | -0.15x | $-442.01K | $3.01 Million | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2007 | -0.33x | $-1.15 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2006 | -1.16x | $-1.65 Million | $1.43 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2005 | -4.47x | $-3.27 Million | $731.39K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2004 | -5.05x | $-4.28 Million | $848.62K | ▼ -2460.4% |
| 2003 | -0.20x | $-820.59K | $4.16 Million | ▼ -114.3% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | $-676.18K | $7.35 Million | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | $-1.38 Million | $5.97 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2000 | -0.67x | $-2.84 Million | $4.26 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 1999 | -1.53x | $-5.33 Million | $3.49 Million | ▲ +84.0% |
| 1998 | -9.56x | $-8.60 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -205.0% |
| 1997 | -3.13x | $-4.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 1996 | -2.14x | $-1.50 Million | $700.00K | — |