Milestone Scientific (MLSS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Milestone Scientific (MLSS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $81.78K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.94 Million) in one year. See Milestone Scientific (MLSS) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Milestone Scientific Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Milestone Scientific across 29 annual periods. Also explore Milestone Scientific (MLSS) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Milestone Scientific (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Milestone Scientific. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Milestone Scientific stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.74x | $-2.92 Million | $3.96 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2023 | -1.59x | $-5.33 Million | $3.36 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2022 | -1.63x | $-6.03 Million | $3.70 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2021 | -1.12x | $-4.02 Million | $3.59 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2020 | -2.02x | $-6.98 Million | $3.46 Million | ▼ -458.4% |
| 2019 | -0.36x | $-1.78 Million | $4.93 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2018 | -0.33x | $-1.63 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -120.9% |
| 2017 | -0.15x | $-1.23 Million | $8.13 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2016 | -1.08x | $-5.40 Million | $5.01 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2015 | -0.81x | $-2.95 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -622.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $376.94K | $2.44 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2013 | 0.50x | $1.26 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +3819.1% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-49.72K | $3.72 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-570.73K | $5.06 Million | ▼ -64.3% |
| 2010 | -0.07x | $-293.78K | $4.28 Million | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $402.95K | $2.21 Million | ▲ +224.3% |
| 2008 | -0.15x | $-442.01K | $3.01 Million | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2007 | -0.33x | $-1.15 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +71.2% |
| 2006 | -1.16x | $-1.65 Million | $1.43 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2005 | -4.47x | $-3.27 Million | $731.39K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2004 | -5.05x | $-4.28 Million | $848.62K | ▼ -2460.4% |
| 2003 | -0.20x | $-820.59K | $4.16 Million | ▼ -114.3% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | $-676.18K | $7.35 Million | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | $-1.38 Million | $5.97 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2000 | -0.67x | $-2.84 Million | $4.26 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 1999 | -1.53x | $-5.33 Million | $3.49 Million | ▲ +84.0% |
| 1998 | -9.56x | $-8.60 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -205.0% |
| 1997 | -3.13x | $-4.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 1996 | -2.14x | $-1.50 Million | $700.00K | — |