Milestone Scientific (MLSS) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Milestone Scientific (MLSS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 96.2% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($96.04K) from net assets ($2.55 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See working capital position of Milestone Scientific to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Milestone Scientific Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2024)
This chart shows how Milestone Scientific's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1996 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 96.2%, reflecting net assets of $2.55 Million with intangible assets of $96.04K USD. See defensive interval ratio of Milestone Scientific to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Milestone Scientific (1996–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Milestone Scientific from 1996 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market value of Milestone Scientific.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 97.5% | $5.83 Million | $148.40K | $9.80 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2023 | 97.8% | $8.01 Million | $178.64K | $11.37 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 97.7% | $10.01 Million | $227.96K | $13.70 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2021 | 98.3% | $16.22 Million | $277.62K | $19.81 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 98.0% | $16.11 Million | $329.25K | $19.57 Million | ▲ +21.4 pp |
| 2019 | 76.5% | $1.63 Million | $382.26K | $6.56 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2018 | 71.5% | $1.53 Million | $435.27K | $6.40 Million | ▲ +8.7 pp |
| 2017 | 62.8% | $7.50 Million | $2.79 Million | $15.63 Million | ▼ -29.5 pp |
| 2016 | 92.3% | $8.54 Million | $660.46K | $13.55 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 92.2% | $9.17 Million | $715.54K | $12.81 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2014 | 96.5% | $15.04 Million | $530.03K | $17.48 Million | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2013 | 89.3% | $5.52 Million | $591.74K | $8.06 Million | ▲ +22.8 pp |
| 2012 | 66.5% | $1.94 Million | $648.66K | $5.66 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2011 | 63.9% | $1.94 Million | $698.36K | $6.99 Million | ▲ +4.4 pp |
| 2010 | 59.5% | $2.33 Million | $944.86K | $6.61 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2009 | 64.1% | $2.64 Million | $947.32K | $4.85 Million | ▲ +28.5 pp |
| 2008 | 35.6% | $1.40 Million | $901.04K | $4.41 Million | ▼ -28.0 pp |
| 2007 | 63.6% | $1.54 Million | $559.38K | $4.99 Million | ▼ -22.2 pp |
| 2006 | 85.8% | $3.71 Million | $526.75K | $5.14 Million | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2005 | 92.3% | $6.32 Million | $486.63K | $7.05 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2004 | 97.8% | $4.52 Million | $101.24K | $5.37 Million | ▲ +67.8 pp |
| 1999 | 30.0% | $2.13 Million | $1.49 Million | $5.62 Million | ▼ -49.6 pp |
| 1998 | 79.5% | $8.30 Million | $1.70 Million | $9.20 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 1997 | 89.2% | $18.50 Million | $2.00 Million | $20.00 Million | ▲ +39.2 pp |
| 1996 | 50.0% | $4.00 Million | $2.00 Million | $4.70 Million | — |