Mega Matrix Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mega Matrix Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.56x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.43 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($4.36 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Mega Matrix Corp. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mega Matrix Corp. (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mega Matrix Corp. from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mega Matrix Corp. across 29 annual periods. Check Mega Matrix Corp. cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mega Matrix Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Mega Matrix Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mega Matrix Corp.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mega Matrix Corp. operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.27x | $-9.91 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -395.5% |
| 2024 | 0.77x | $4.12 Million | $5.35 Million | ▲ +175.4% |
| 2023 | -1.02x | $-3.00 Million | $2.94 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | $-5.86 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2021 | -1.20x | $-3.76 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -3443.3% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $3.98 Million | $110.99 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $8.17 Million | $126.34 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $17.94 Million | $175.61 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $14.57 Million | $189.04 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $11.34 Million | $176.24 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $10.56 Million | $139.75 Million | ▲ +140.9% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $5.24 Million | $166.93 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $6.87 Million | $114.97 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $24.92 Million | $106.55 Million | ▲ +624.4% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $2.91 Million | $90.14 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $4.62 Million | $90.87 Million | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $18.87 Million | $91.69 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $15.31 Million | $96.90 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $15.77 Million | $94.51 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $8.09 Million | $78.16 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $6.95 Million | $77.56 Million | ▲ +954.9% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $553.63K | $65.13 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $3.30 Million | $55.13 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $3.30 Million | $56.73 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $2.99 Million | $48.65 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $4.30 Million | $54.30 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $4.00 Million | $47.70 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $1.31 Million | $12.05 Million | ▲ +116.0% |
| 1997 | -0.68x | $-142.02K | $207.69K | — |