Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.56x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.43 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($4.36 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Mega Matrix Corp. generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mega Matrix Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mega Matrix Corp. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Mega Matrix Corp. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mega Matrix Corp. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mega Matrix Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Mega Matrix Corp..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.27x | $-9.91 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -395.5% |
| 2024 | 0.77x | $4.12 Million | $5.35 Million | ▲ +175.4% |
| 2023 | -1.02x | $-3.00 Million | $2.94 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | $-5.86 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2021 | -1.20x | $-3.76 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -3443.3% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $3.98 Million | $110.99 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $8.17 Million | $126.34 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $17.94 Million | $175.61 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $14.57 Million | $189.04 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $11.34 Million | $176.24 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $10.56 Million | $139.75 Million | ▲ +140.9% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $5.24 Million | $166.93 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $6.87 Million | $114.97 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $24.92 Million | $106.55 Million | ▲ +624.4% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $2.91 Million | $90.14 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $4.62 Million | $90.87 Million | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $18.87 Million | $91.69 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $15.31 Million | $96.90 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $15.77 Million | $94.51 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $8.09 Million | $78.16 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $6.95 Million | $77.56 Million | ▲ +954.9% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $553.63K | $65.13 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $3.30 Million | $55.13 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $3.30 Million | $56.73 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $2.99 Million | $48.65 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $4.30 Million | $54.30 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $4.00 Million | $47.70 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $1.31 Million | $12.05 Million | ▲ +116.0% |
| 1997 | -0.68x | $-142.02K | $207.69K | — |