Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.56x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.43 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($4.36 Million) in one year. See Mega Matrix Corp. (MPU) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mega Matrix Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mega Matrix Corp. across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mega Matrix Corp. cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mega Matrix Corp. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mega Matrix Corp.. Check MPU cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.27x | $-9.91 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -395.5% |
| 2024 | 0.77x | $4.12 Million | $5.35 Million | ▲ +175.4% |
| 2023 | -1.02x | $-3.00 Million | $2.94 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | $-5.86 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2021 | -1.20x | $-3.76 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -3443.3% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $3.98 Million | $110.99 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $8.17 Million | $126.34 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $17.94 Million | $175.61 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $14.57 Million | $189.04 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $11.34 Million | $176.24 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $10.56 Million | $139.75 Million | ▲ +140.9% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $5.24 Million | $166.93 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $6.87 Million | $114.97 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $24.92 Million | $106.55 Million | ▲ +624.4% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $2.91 Million | $90.14 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $4.62 Million | $90.87 Million | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $18.87 Million | $91.69 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $15.31 Million | $96.90 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $15.77 Million | $94.51 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $8.09 Million | $78.16 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $6.95 Million | $77.56 Million | ▲ +954.9% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $553.63K | $65.13 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $3.30 Million | $55.13 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $3.30 Million | $56.73 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $2.99 Million | $48.65 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $4.30 Million | $54.30 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $4.00 Million | $47.70 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $1.31 Million | $12.05 Million | ▲ +116.0% |
| 1997 | -0.68x | $-142.02K | $207.69K | — |