Emerson Radio Corporation (MSN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Emerson Radio Corporation (MSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.44x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.04 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($1.41 Million) in one year. See Emerson Radio Corporation free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Emerson Radio Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Emerson Radio Corporation across 33 annual periods. Also explore Emerson Radio Corporation (MSN) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Emerson Radio Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Emerson Radio Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MSN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.79x | $-3.65 Million | $2.04 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2024 | -1.85x | $-5.26 Million | $2.84 Million | ▼ -3477.0% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-306.00K | $5.91 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2022 | -1.48x | $-4.71 Million | $3.19 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2021 | -1.24x | $-4.29 Million | $3.46 Million | ▼ -126.1% |
| 2020 | -0.55x | $-1.91 Million | $3.48 Million | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2019 | -0.70x | $-2.19 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2018 | -1.30x | $-5.16 Million | $3.97 Million | ▼ -163.9% |
| 2017 | 2.03x | $1.87 Million | $921.00K | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2016 | 2.55x | $6.77 Million | $2.66 Million | ▲ +126.0% |
| 2015 | 1.13x | $4.47 Million | $3.96 Million | ▲ +155.0% |
| 2014 | -2.05x | $-8.09 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -197.2% |
| 2013 | 2.11x | $21.71 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +15049.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-152.00K | $10.78 Million | ▼ -101.0% |
| 2011 | 1.35x | $25.07 Million | $18.62 Million | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2010 | 0.95x | $26.44 Million | $27.91 Million | ▲ +920.8% |
| 2009 | -0.12x | $-3.03 Million | $26.24 Million | ▼ -109.1% |
| 2008 | 1.27x | $29.50 Million | $23.18 Million | ▲ +296.5% |
| 2007 | -0.65x | $-16.53 Million | $25.52 Million | ▼ -264.2% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $8.81 Million | $22.35 Million | ▲ +354.0% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | $-9.45 Million | $60.87 Million | ▼ -2826.2% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $317.00K | $55.66 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $15.47 Million | $66.75 Million | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $9.84 Million | $83.77 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $9.77 Million | $83.59 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $6.37 Million | $45.43 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $5.30 Million | $44.30 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $6.10 Million | $38.00 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 1997 | 0.39x | $16.70 Million | $42.80 Million | ▲ +292.4% |
| 1996 | -0.20x | $-11.40 Million | $56.20 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 1995 | -0.35x | $-21.00 Million | $60.30 Million | ▼ -196.4% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $27.60 Million | $76.40 Million | ▲ +549.2% |
| 1993 | -0.08x | $-20.30 Million | $252.40 Million | — |