Network-1 Technologies Inc (NTIP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Network-1 Technologies Inc (NTIP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.20x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-104.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($512.00K) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Network-1 Technologies Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Network-1 Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Network-1 Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Network-1 Technologies Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Network-1 Technologies Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Network-1 Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Network-1 Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.98x | $-1.08 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -567.1% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $331.00K | $1.58 Million | ▲ +111.0% |
| 2022 | -1.90x | $-5.44 Million | $2.86 Million | ▼ -145.4% |
| 2021 | 4.18x | $19.50 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +1789.6% |
| 2020 | -0.25x | $-503.00K | $2.03 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2019 | -0.39x | $-605.00K | $1.57 Million | ▼ -109.8% |
| 2018 | 3.93x | $8.09 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2017 | 2.35x | $6.77 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2016 | 6.33x | $29.91 Million | $4.72 Million | ▲ +90.0% |
| 2015 | 3.33x | $5.63 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2014 | 2.61x | $5.76 Million | $2.21 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2013 | 3.57x | $2.73 Million | $764.00K | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2012 | 3.24x | $2.67 Million | $825.00K | ▲ +185.1% |
| 2011 | 1.14x | $1.97 Million | $1.73 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 2010 | 9.21x | $19.99 Million | $2.17 Million | ▲ +468.9% |
| 2009 | -2.50x | $-1.46 Million | $585.00K | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2008 | -4.18x | $-1.41 Million | $337.00K | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2007 | -4.89x | $-1.79 Million | $367.00K | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2006 | -2.21x | $-1.26 Million | $569.00K | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2005 | -5.07x | $-1.84 Million | $363.00K | ▼ -643.7% |
| 2004 | -0.68x | $-842.00K | $1.24 Million | ▲ +67.3% |
| 2003 | -2.09x | $-1.36 Million | $652.00K | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2002 | -4.58x | $-4.93 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2001 | -3.73x | $-4.95 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2000 | -2.38x | $-4.34 Million | $1.82 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1999 | -2.27x | $-5.50 Million | $2.43 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 1998 | -2.72x | $-2.53 Million | $929.00K | ▼ -873.0% |
| 1997 | -0.28x | $-700.00K | $2.50 Million | — |