Park National Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Park National Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Park National Corporation (PRK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $58.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.45 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Park National Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Park National Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Park National Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Park National Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check PRK total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Park National Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Park National Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Park National Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Park National Corporation generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $198.32 Million | $8.45 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $178.85 Million | $8.56 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $150.50 Million | $8.69 Billion | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $134.86 Million | $8.79 Billion | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $157.33 Million | $8.45 Billion | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $111.65 Million | $8.24 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $111.01 Million | $7.59 Billion | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $132.95 Million | $6.97 Billion | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $87.99 Million | $6.78 Billion | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $87.89 Million | $6.73 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $88.70 Million | $6.60 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $122.73 Million | $6.30 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $114.55 Million | $5.99 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $105.20 Million | $5.99 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $126.73 Million | $6.23 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $126.13 Million | $6.55 Billion | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $71.90 Million | $6.32 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $90.70 Million | $6.43 Billion | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $83.19 Million | $5.92 Billion | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $85.25 Million | $4.90 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $81.00 Million | $4.88 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $85.05 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $99.21 Million | $4.49 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $80.37 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $98.18 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▲ +18.8% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $58.24 Million | $2.89 Billion | ▼ -43.1% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $84.84 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +84.2% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $42.80 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $44.80 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▲ +17.3% |
| 1996 | 0.02x | $27.10 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -22.6% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $32.00 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $30.10 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +162.7% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $10.80 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -60.3% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $26.30 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $20.50 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 1990 | 0.02x | $18.70 Million | $1.03 Billion | — |