Palatin Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Palatin Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Palatin Technologies Inc (PTN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.53x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.35 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($10.12 Million) in one year. Check Palatin Technologies Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Palatin Technologies Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Palatin Technologies Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Palatin Technologies Inc across 29 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Palatin Technologies Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Palatin Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Palatin Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Palatin Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Palatin Technologies Inc (PTN) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.90x | $-31.46 Million | $10.85 Million | ▼ -81.6% |
| 2023 | -1.60x | $-28.42 Million | $17.81 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2022 | -1.51x | $-29.92 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2021 | -1.28x | $-22.65 Million | $17.65 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 2020 | 8.47x | $41.33 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +262.7% |
| 2019 | -5.20x | $-21.78 Million | $4.19 Million | ▼ -3782.5% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.70 Million | $12.05 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $12.88 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2016 | -1.65x | $-47.36 Million | $28.64 Million | ▼ -113.8% |
| 2015 | -0.77x | $-13.36 Million | $17.27 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2014 | -4.41x | $-12.21 Million | $2.77 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2013 | -6.51x | $-13.65 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2012 | -4.36x | $-15.49 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2011 | -3.70x | $-11.03 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2010 | -1.87x | $-5.73 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -238.9% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-5.44 Million | $9.89 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2008 | -1.64x | $-20.58 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | $-22.05 Million | $24.25 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2006 | -1.08x | $-23.45 Million | $21.75 Million | ▼ -452.4% |
| 2005 | -0.20x | $-5.06 Million | $25.94 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2004 | -4.76x | $-23.74 Million | $4.99 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2003 | -4.89x | $-19.89 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2002 | -3.58x | $-13.15 Million | $3.67 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2001 | -3.61x | $-8.40 Million | $2.33 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2000 | -4.31x | $-8.54 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 1999 | -2.36x | $-10.40 Million | $4.40 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 1998 | -2.39x | $-7.40 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -150.4% |
| 1997 | -0.95x | $-4.10 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1996 | -0.64x | $-2.71 Million | $4.20 Million | — |