Palatin Technologies Inc (PTN) — Net Asset Quality Index
Palatin Technologies Inc (PTN) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -171.3% as of March 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $3.73 Million minus total liabilities of $10.12 Million yields net assets of $-6.39 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Palatin Technologies Inc balance sheet liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Palatin Technologies Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1996–2024)
This chart shows how Palatin Technologies Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1996 to 2024. As of March 2025, the index stands at -171.3%, representing net assets of $-6.39 Million against total assets of $3.73 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see PTN market cap overview.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Palatin Technologies Inc (1996–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Palatin Technologies Inc from 1996 to 2024, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Palatin Technologies Inc (PTN) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.0% | $-111.50K | $10.74 Million | $10.85 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2023 | 0.7% | $134.07K | $17.94 Million | $17.81 Million | ▼ -44.4 pp |
| 2022 | 45.1% | $16.27 Million | $36.07 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -28.7 pp |
| 2021 | 73.8% | $49.65 Million | $67.30 Million | $17.65 Million | ▼ -20.5 pp |
| 2020 | 94.3% | $80.17 Million | $85.05 Million | $4.88 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2019 | 96.0% | $100.55 Million | $104.74 Million | $4.19 Million | ▲ +26.9 pp |
| 2018 | 69.1% | $26.96 Million | $39.02 Million | $12.05 Million | ▲ +78.2 pp |
| 2017 | -9.1% | $-5.16 Million | $56.83 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +150.0 pp |
| 2016 | -159.1% | $-17.59 Million | $11.05 Million | $28.64 Million | ▼ -200.5 pp |
| 2015 | 41.4% | $12.20 Million | $29.47 Million | $17.27 Million | ▼ -36.5 pp |
| 2014 | 77.9% | $9.79 Million | $12.56 Million | $2.77 Million | ▼ -13.7 pp |
| 2013 | 91.6% | $22.98 Million | $25.07 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +57.6 pp |
| 2012 | 34.0% | $1.83 Million | $5.38 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -51.9 pp |
| 2011 | 85.9% | $18.19 Million | $21.17 Million | $2.98 Million | ▲ +10.7 pp |
| 2010 | 75.2% | $9.32 Million | $12.39 Million | $3.07 Million | ▲ +50.1 pp |
| 2009 | 25.1% | $3.31 Million | $13.20 Million | $9.89 Million | ▼ -9.2 pp |
| 2008 | 34.3% | $6.55 Million | $19.12 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -9.1 pp |
| 2007 | 43.3% | $18.53 Million | $42.78 Million | $24.25 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 45.7% | $18.30 Million | $40.05 Million | $21.75 Million | ▲ +19.5 pp |
| 2005 | 26.2% | $9.23 Million | $35.17 Million | $25.94 Million | ▼ -53.3 pp |
| 2004 | 79.5% | $19.39 Million | $24.38 Million | $4.99 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2003 | 82.1% | $18.66 Million | $22.72 Million | $4.06 Million | ▲ +11.8 pp |
| 2002 | 70.3% | $8.69 Million | $12.36 Million | $3.67 Million | ▼ -13.4 pp |
| 2001 | 83.7% | $11.92 Million | $14.24 Million | $2.33 Million | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2000 | 77.7% | $6.91 Million | $8.89 Million | $1.98 Million | ▲ +71.3 pp |
| 1999 | 6.4% | $300.00K | $4.70 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -45.9 pp |
| 1998 | 52.3% | $3.40 Million | $6.50 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -17.2 pp |
| 1997 | 69.5% | $9.80 Million | $14.10 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +29.2 pp |
| 1996 | 40.3% | $2.84 Million | $7.04 Million | $4.20 Million | — |