Riley Exploration Permian Inc (REPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Riley Exploration Permian Inc (REPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $47.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($626.64 Million) in one year. See REPX financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Riley Exploration Permian Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Riley Exploration Permian Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see REPX cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Riley Exploration Permian Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Riley Exploration Permian Inc. Check REPX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $212.54 Million | $535.34 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2024 | 0.51x | $246.27 Million | $482.89 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | $207.19 Million | $524.12 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $170.29 Million | $181.85 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2021 | 0.54x | $86.08 Million | $158.33 Million | ▲ +193.2% |
| 2020 | -0.58x | $-1.55 Million | $2.66 Million | ▼ -764.2% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $226.00K | $2.57 Million | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2018 | 0.49x | $1.34 Million | $2.72 Million | ▲ +836.2% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $154.00K | $2.93 Million | ▲ +127.4% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | $-1.01 Million | $5.28 Million | ▼ -1004.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $96.00K | $4.53 Million | ▼ -98.4% |
| 2014 | 1.33x | $6.45 Million | $4.86 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2013 | 1.16x | $7.89 Million | $6.79 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2012 | 0.64x | $9.04 Million | $14.03 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | $8.49 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $4.04 Million | $14.53 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $1.69 Million | $14.33 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | $7.13 Million | $13.87 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2007 | 0.56x | $3.45 Million | $6.18 Million | ▼ -48.3% |
| 2006 | 1.08x | $4.35 Million | $4.03 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | $2.11 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +1671.2% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-370.14K | $10.86 Million | ▼ -310.1% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $314.00K | $19.35 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | $-566.02K | $18.37 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-221.18K | $17.14 Million | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | $-820.62K | $14.36 Million | ▲ +87.2% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-2.56 Million | $5.74 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 1998 | -0.36x | $-2.30 Million | $6.33 Million | ▼ -103.9% |
| 1997 | -0.18x | $-1.54 Million | $8.64 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 1996 | -0.61x | $-770.00K | $1.27 Million | — |