Riley Exploration Permian Inc (REPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Riley Exploration Permian Inc (REPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $47.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($626.64 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Riley Exploration Permian Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Riley Exploration Permian Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Riley Exploration Permian Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Riley Exploration Permian Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Riley Exploration Permian Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Riley Exploration Permian Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see REPX market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $212.54 Million | $535.34 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2024 | 0.51x | $246.27 Million | $482.89 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | $207.19 Million | $524.12 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $170.29 Million | $181.85 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2021 | 0.54x | $86.08 Million | $158.33 Million | ▲ +193.2% |
| 2020 | -0.58x | $-1.55 Million | $2.66 Million | ▼ -764.2% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $226.00K | $2.57 Million | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2018 | 0.49x | $1.34 Million | $2.72 Million | ▲ +836.2% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $154.00K | $2.93 Million | ▲ +127.4% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | $-1.01 Million | $5.28 Million | ▼ -1004.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $96.00K | $4.53 Million | ▼ -98.4% |
| 2014 | 1.33x | $6.45 Million | $4.86 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2013 | 1.16x | $7.89 Million | $6.79 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2012 | 0.64x | $9.04 Million | $14.03 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | $8.49 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $4.04 Million | $14.53 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $1.69 Million | $14.33 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | $7.13 Million | $13.87 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2007 | 0.56x | $3.45 Million | $6.18 Million | ▼ -48.3% |
| 2006 | 1.08x | $4.35 Million | $4.03 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | $2.11 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +1671.2% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-370.14K | $10.86 Million | ▼ -310.1% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $314.00K | $19.35 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | $-566.02K | $18.37 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-221.18K | $17.14 Million | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | $-820.62K | $14.36 Million | ▲ +87.2% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-2.56 Million | $5.74 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 1998 | -0.36x | $-2.30 Million | $6.33 Million | ▼ -103.9% |
| 1997 | -0.18x | $-1.54 Million | $8.64 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 1996 | -0.61x | $-770.00K | $1.27 Million | — |