Standard Lithium Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Standard Lithium Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Standard Lithium Ltd (SLI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($33.74 Million) in one year. Check Standard Lithium Ltd investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Standard Lithium Ltd (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Standard Lithium Ltd from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Standard Lithium Ltd across 24 annual periods. Check Standard Lithium Ltd (SLI) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Standard Lithium Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Standard Lithium Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Standard Lithium Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Standard Lithium Ltd (SLI) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.36x | $-11.42 Million | $31.42 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2024 | -0.46x | $-24.69 Million | $53.21 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2023 | -1.78x | $-25.12 Million | $14.12 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2022 | -3.02x | $-21.48 Million | $7.12 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2021 | -3.41x | $-8.64 Million | $2.53 Million | ▼ -1233.1% |
| 2020 | -0.26x | $-3.11 Million | $12.17 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2019 | -0.71x | $-4.27 Million | $6.01 Million | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2018 | -6.44x | $-4.40 Million | $683.41K | ▼ -2957.4% |
| 2017 | -0.21x | $-239.57K | $1.14 Million | ▼ -1649.7% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-5.51K | $457.46K | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2015 | -0.29x | $-95.37K | $327.50K | ▲ +53.4% |
| 2014 | -0.62x | $-151.95K | $243.41K | ▲ +65.6% |
| 2013 | -1.82x | $-314.54K | $173.14K | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2012 | -9.35x | $-803.34K | $85.91K | ▼ -5267.4% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $72.64K | $401.43K | ▲ +102.9% |
| 2010 | -6.30x | $-463.99K | $73.67K | ▼ -610.7% |
| 2009 | 1.23x | $164.61K | $133.47K | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2008 | 1.11x | $495.67K | $444.64K | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2007 | 0.82x | $212.91K | $260.17K | ▼ -66.6% |
| 2006 | 2.45x | $406.94K | $166.19K | ▼ -45.7% |
| 2005 | 4.51x | $181.38K | $40.25K | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2004 | 15.08x | $292.89K | $19.43K | ▲ +887.1% |
| 2003 | 1.53x | $25.45K | $16.66K | ▲ +135.3% |
| 2002 | -4.33x | $-142.59K | $32.93K | — |