Standard Lithium Ltd (SLI) — Net Asset Quality Index
Standard Lithium Ltd (SLI) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 88.2% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $286.86 Million minus total liabilities of $33.74 Million yields net assets of $253.12 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read debt load of Standard Lithium Ltd for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Standard Lithium Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Standard Lithium Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of September 2025, the index stands at 88.2%, representing net assets of $253.12 Million against total assets of $286.86 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see SLI market cap overview.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Standard Lithium Ltd (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Standard Lithium Ltd from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check strategic asset allocation of Standard Lithium Ltd to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 87.9% | $227.92 Million | $259.34 Million | $31.42 Million | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2024 | 81.5% | $233.70 Million | $286.91 Million | $53.21 Million | ▼ -10.4 pp |
| 2023 | 91.9% | $159.38 Million | $173.50 Million | $14.12 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2022 | 96.1% | $176.53 Million | $183.65 Million | $7.12 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2021 | 96.6% | $71.54 Million | $74.08 Million | $2.53 Million | ▲ +17.6 pp |
| 2020 | 78.9% | $45.60 Million | $57.76 Million | $12.17 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2019 | 86.5% | $38.38 Million | $44.39 Million | $6.01 Million | ▼ -11.3 pp |
| 2018 | 97.8% | $30.24 Million | $30.92 Million | $683.41K | ▲ +21.4 pp |
| 2017 | 76.4% | $3.68 Million | $4.82 Million | $1.14 Million | ▲ +10876.1 pp |
| 2016 | -10799.7% | $-453.26K | $4.20K | $457.46K | ▼ -7705.8 pp |
| 2015 | -3093.9% | $-317.25K | $10.25K | $327.50K | ▼ -3076.8 pp |
| 2014 | -17.0% | $-35.44K | $207.97K | $243.41K | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2013 | -8.9% | $-14.08K | $159.05K | $173.14K | ▼ -43.3 pp |
| 2012 | 34.4% | $45.09K | $131.00K | $85.91K | ▼ -17.0 pp |
| 2011 | 51.4% | $425.05K | $826.49K | $401.43K | ▼ -44.0 pp |
| 2010 | 95.4% | $1.52 Million | $1.60 Million | $73.67K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2009 | 93.2% | $1.82 Million | $1.95 Million | $133.47K | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2008 | 81.8% | $1.99 Million | $2.44 Million | $444.64K | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2007 | 89.3% | $2.17 Million | $2.43 Million | $260.17K | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2006 | 92.7% | $2.10 Million | $2.26 Million | $166.19K | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2005 | 97.6% | $1.64 Million | $1.68 Million | $40.25K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2004 | 98.7% | $1.47 Million | $1.49 Million | $19.43K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 98.7% | $1.29 Million | $1.31 Million | $16.66K | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2002 | 91.1% | $336.98K | $369.91K | $32.93K | — |