Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc (MLP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc (MLP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-932.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.12 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MLP company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | $370.00K | $16.96 Million | ▲ +112.0% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | $-1.37 Million | $7.52 Million | ▼ -125.1% |
| 2022 | 0.73x | $6.26 Million | $8.63 Million | ▲ +649.4% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $1.39 Million | $14.33 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $2.20 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $1.77 Million | $16.43 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $882.00K | $17.18 Million | ▼ -91.6% |
| 2017 | 0.61x | $8.35 Million | $13.66 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2016 | 1.60x | $33.88 Million | $21.14 Million | ▲ +768.1% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $10.62 Million | $57.54 Million | ▲ +534.8% |
| 2014 | -0.04x | $-2.74 Million | $64.45 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2013 | -0.04x | $-3.59 Million | $80.98 Million | ▼ -12.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-3.77 Million | $95.85 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-10.22 Million | $90.33 Million | ▼ -38.2% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-9.39 Million | $114.65 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2009 | -0.08x | $-15.87 Million | $204.99 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2008 | -0.24x | $-51.80 Million | $216.51 Million | ▼ -344.7% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | $-7.58 Million | $140.91 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2006 | -0.17x | $-20.23 Million | $119.29 Million | ▼ -262.1% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $9.87 Million | $94.30 Million | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2004 | 0.31x | $27.62 Million | $88.80 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $16.19 Million | $84.81 Million | ▲ +664.9% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $3.00 Million | $120.27 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $15.95 Million | $102.44 Million | ▲ +853.7% |
| 2000 | 0.02x | $1.69 Million | $103.62 Million | ▼ -92.4% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $18.50 Million | $86.60 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $17.60 Million | $73.70 Million | ▲ +417.2% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $3.50 Million | $75.80 Million | ▼ -70.6% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $11.75 Million | $74.82 Million | ▲ +473.7% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $2.14 Million | $78.22 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 1994 | 0.07x | $11.54 Million | $174.98 Million | — |