Par Pacific Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Par Pacific Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Par Pacific Holdings Inc (PARR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-166.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.66 Billion) in one year. Check Par Pacific Holdings Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Par Pacific Holdings Inc (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Par Pacific Holdings Inc from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Par Pacific Holdings Inc across 34 annual periods. Check PARR total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Par Pacific Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Par Pacific Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Par Pacific Holdings Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Par Pacific Holdings Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $445.34 Million | $2.52 Billion | ▲ +457.1% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $83.78 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▼ -86.1% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $579.16 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | $452.61 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▲ +1532.5% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-27.62 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-37.21 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -138.3% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $105.63 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $90.62 Million | $948.40 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $106.48 Million | $899.69 Million | ▲ +492.9% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | $-23.39 Million | $776.52 Million | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $132.36 Million | $551.65 Million | ▲ +294.7% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-54.60 Million | $443.08 Million | ▼ -102.1% |
| 2013 | -0.06x | $-35.68 Million | $584.95 Million | ▼ -2180.3% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $990.00K | $337.67 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $990.00K | $337.67 Million | ▲ +104.6% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | $-33.00 Million | $512.52 Million | ▼ -160.3% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $81.14 Million | $760.37 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $140.68 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | $87.00 Million | $569.49 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $53.39 Million | $473.70 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $44.86 Million | $357.44 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $9.62 Million | $86.46 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $8.00 Million | $38.94 Million | ▲ +420.3% |
| 2002 | -0.06x | $-1.87 Million | $29.16 Million | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $2.92 Million | $14.49 Million | ▲ +278.0% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-1.14 Million | $10.10 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 1999 | -0.95x | $-1.50 Million | $1.58 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 1998 | -1.88x | $-1.50 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -73.1% |
| 1997 | -1.08x | $-1.30 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -90.9% |
| 1996 | -0.57x | $-2.10 Million | $3.70 Million | ▼ -376.8% |
| 1995 | -0.12x | $-500.00K | $4.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.12x | $-500.00K | $4.20 Million | ▼ -281.5% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $400.00K | $6.10 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $300.00K | $3.00 Million | — |