REX American Resources Corporation (REX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
REX American Resources Corporation (REX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($83.92 Million) in one year. See REX American Resources Corporation (REX) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
REX American Resources Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for REX American Resources Corporation across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see REX cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for REX American Resources Corporation (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for REX American Resources Corporation. Check REX cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.23x | $117.83 Million | $95.73 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2025 | 0.84x | $64.19 Million | $76.41 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2024 | 1.66x | $127.97 Million | $77.20 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2023 | 0.80x | $54.80 Million | $68.58 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | $91.71 Million | $62.80 Million | ▲ +614.1% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $8.62 Million | $42.16 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $10.34 Million | $46.90 Million | ▼ -88.0% |
| 2019 | 1.83x | $47.93 Million | $26.12 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | $40.97 Million | $46.94 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2017 | 1.05x | $69.11 Million | $65.75 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $40.19 Million | $58.93 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2015 | 2.14x | $137.22 Million | $63.98 Million | ▲ +289.8% |
| 2014 | 0.55x | $64.44 Million | $117.11 Million | ▲ +322.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $17.05 Million | $131.05 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $34.90 Million | $156.21 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $27.92 Million | $105.76 Million | ▲ +324.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $10.98 Million | $176.41 Million | ▲ +299.5% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $2.92 Million | $187.66 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $14.83 Million | $124.66 Million | ▼ -65.2% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $31.82 Million | $92.98 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $19.04 Million | $80.93 Million | ▲ +392.9% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-8.23 Million | $102.40 Million | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $35.88 Million | $129.48 Million | ▲ +209.5% |
| 2003 | -0.25x | $-38.40 Million | $151.82 Million | ▼ -195.3% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $42.27 Million | $159.36 Million | ▲ +4427.0% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $1.05 Million | $179.69 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $10.32 Million | $144.20 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $10.20 Million | $158.10 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $35.50 Million | $154.70 Million | ▲ +205.9% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $10.90 Million | $145.30 Million | ▲ +348.1% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-4.00 Million | $132.30 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-16.00 Million | $103.20 Million | ▼ -496.4% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $3.00 Million | $76.70 Million | ▼ -67.4% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $7.10 Million | $59.10 Million | ▲ +519.4% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $900.00K | $46.40 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $7.10 Million | $42.10 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 1990 | -0.36x | $-11.80 Million | $32.70 Million | — |