REX American Resources Corporation (REX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
REX American Resources Corporation (REX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.55x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $51.24 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($93.86 Million) in one year. See REX American Resources Corporation free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
REX American Resources Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for REX American Resources Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore REX year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for REX American Resources Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for REX American Resources Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see REX market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.84x | $64.19 Million | $76.41 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2024 | 1.66x | $127.97 Million | $77.20 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2023 | 0.80x | $54.80 Million | $68.58 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | $91.71 Million | $62.80 Million | ▲ +614.1% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $8.62 Million | $42.16 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $10.34 Million | $46.90 Million | ▼ -88.0% |
| 2019 | 1.83x | $47.93 Million | $26.12 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | $40.97 Million | $46.94 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2017 | 1.05x | $69.11 Million | $65.75 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $40.19 Million | $58.93 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2015 | 2.14x | $137.22 Million | $63.98 Million | ▲ +289.8% |
| 2014 | 0.55x | $64.44 Million | $117.11 Million | ▲ +322.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $17.05 Million | $131.05 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $34.90 Million | $156.21 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $27.92 Million | $105.76 Million | ▲ +324.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $10.98 Million | $176.41 Million | ▲ +299.5% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $2.92 Million | $187.66 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $14.83 Million | $124.66 Million | ▼ -65.2% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $31.82 Million | $92.98 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $19.04 Million | $80.93 Million | ▲ +392.9% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-8.23 Million | $102.40 Million | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $35.88 Million | $129.48 Million | ▲ +209.5% |
| 2003 | -0.25x | $-38.40 Million | $151.82 Million | ▼ -195.3% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $42.27 Million | $159.36 Million | ▲ +4427.0% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $1.05 Million | $179.69 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $10.32 Million | $144.20 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $10.20 Million | $158.10 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $35.50 Million | $154.70 Million | ▲ +205.9% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $10.90 Million | $145.30 Million | ▲ +348.1% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-4.00 Million | $132.30 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-16.00 Million | $103.20 Million | ▼ -496.4% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $3.00 Million | $76.70 Million | ▼ -67.4% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $7.10 Million | $59.10 Million | ▲ +519.4% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $900.00K | $46.40 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $7.10 Million | $42.10 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 1990 | -0.36x | $-11.80 Million | $32.70 Million | — |