REX American Resources Corporation (REX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
REX American Resources Corporation (REX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($83.92 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of REX American Resources Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
REX American Resources Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for REX American Resources Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore REX American Resources Corporation (REX) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for REX American Resources Corporation (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for REX American Resources Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see REX American Resources Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.23x | $117.83 Million | $95.73 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2025 | 0.84x | $64.19 Million | $76.41 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2024 | 1.66x | $127.97 Million | $77.20 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2023 | 0.80x | $54.80 Million | $68.58 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | $91.71 Million | $62.80 Million | ▲ +614.1% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $8.62 Million | $42.16 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $10.34 Million | $46.90 Million | ▼ -88.0% |
| 2019 | 1.83x | $47.93 Million | $26.12 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | $40.97 Million | $46.94 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2017 | 1.05x | $69.11 Million | $65.75 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $40.19 Million | $58.93 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 2015 | 2.14x | $137.22 Million | $63.98 Million | ▲ +289.8% |
| 2014 | 0.55x | $64.44 Million | $117.11 Million | ▲ +322.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $17.05 Million | $131.05 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $34.90 Million | $156.21 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $27.92 Million | $105.76 Million | ▲ +324.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $10.98 Million | $176.41 Million | ▲ +299.5% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $2.92 Million | $187.66 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $14.83 Million | $124.66 Million | ▼ -65.2% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $31.82 Million | $92.98 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $19.04 Million | $80.93 Million | ▲ +392.9% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-8.23 Million | $102.40 Million | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $35.88 Million | $129.48 Million | ▲ +209.5% |
| 2003 | -0.25x | $-38.40 Million | $151.82 Million | ▼ -195.3% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $42.27 Million | $159.36 Million | ▲ +4427.0% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $1.05 Million | $179.69 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $10.32 Million | $144.20 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $10.20 Million | $158.10 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $35.50 Million | $154.70 Million | ▲ +205.9% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $10.90 Million | $145.30 Million | ▲ +348.1% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-4.00 Million | $132.30 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-16.00 Million | $103.20 Million | ▼ -496.4% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $3.00 Million | $76.70 Million | ▼ -67.4% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $7.10 Million | $59.10 Million | ▲ +519.4% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $900.00K | $46.40 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $7.10 Million | $42.10 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 1990 | -0.36x | $-11.80 Million | $32.70 Million | — |