Sturm Ruger & Company Inc (RGR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sturm Ruger & Company Inc (RGR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($62.69 Million) in one year. See RGR cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sturm Ruger & Company Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sturm Ruger & Company Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore Sturm Ruger & Company Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sturm Ruger & Company Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sturm Ruger & Company Inc (RGR) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.86x | $55.50 Million | $64.45 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2023 | 0.51x | $33.90 Million | $67.10 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2022 | 0.46x | $77.23 Million | $168.03 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2021 | 2.19x | $172.34 Million | $78.68 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2020 | 1.72x | $143.81 Million | $83.56 Million | ▲ +120.4% |
| 2019 | 0.78x | $49.59 Million | $63.50 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2018 | 1.68x | $119.81 Million | $71.29 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2017 | 1.87x | $101.19 Million | $54.17 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2016 | 1.17x | $104.80 Million | $89.50 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2015 | 1.28x | $112.57 Million | $88.14 Million | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2014 | 0.81x | $55.55 Million | $68.92 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2013 | 1.22x | $119.67 Million | $98.03 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2012 | 1.10x | $87.19 Million | $79.45 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2011 | 0.83x | $57.41 Million | $69.12 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2010 | 0.75x | $32.49 Million | $43.28 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2009 | 1.01x | $46.69 Million | $46.16 Million | ▲ +326.5% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $11.18 Million | $47.16 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2007 | 0.75x | $19.32 Million | $25.81 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2006 | 1.02x | $30.22 Million | $29.74 Million | ▲ +443.6% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $5.25 Million | $28.06 Million | ▲ +281.7% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $1.31 Million | $26.77 Million | ▼ -87.9% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | $14.71 Million | $36.37 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $9.94 Million | $45.98 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2001 | 0.57x | $22.98 Million | $40.04 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $17.36 Million | $38.74 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1999 | 1.27x | $56.70 Million | $44.80 Million | ▲ +116.6% |
| 1998 | 0.58x | $24.60 Million | $42.10 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 1997 | 1.05x | $49.10 Million | $46.90 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 1996 | 0.56x | $24.40 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 1995 | 0.38x | $16.90 Million | $44.90 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 1994 | 0.82x | $35.40 Million | $43.20 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1993 | 1.19x | $49.50 Million | $41.70 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 1992 | 0.85x | $29.40 Million | $34.50 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 1991 | 0.78x | $24.50 Million | $31.60 Million | ▲ +155.5% |
| 1990 | 0.30x | $8.80 Million | $29.00 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 1989 | 0.71x | $20.50 Million | $28.70 Million | — |