ResMed Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ResMed Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. ResMed Inc (RMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $554.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.29 Billion) in one year. Check ResMed Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of ResMed Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of ResMed Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for ResMed Inc across 33 annual periods. Check RMD cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
ResMed Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
ResMed Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ResMed Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ResMed Inc (RMD) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | $1.75 Billion | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2024 | 0.70x | $1.40 Billion | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +163.9% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | $693.30 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $351.15 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $736.72 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $802.25 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $459.05 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | $505.03 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | $414.05 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2016 | 0.35x | $547.93 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2015 | 0.64x | $383.18 Million | $596.95 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.65x | $391.27 Million | $602.71 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0.67x | $402.82 Million | $600.21 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $383.16 Million | $530.24 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | $283.19 Million | $338.19 Million | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2010 | 0.56x | $188.21 Million | $338.86 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2009 | 0.61x | $238.88 Million | $392.78 Million | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $137.84 Million | $324.23 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $91.11 Million | $320.82 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $99.03 Million | $269.07 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $71.08 Million | $300.08 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $76.54 Million | $187.65 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $59.28 Million | $173.16 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $35.64 Million | $183.26 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $29.52 Million | $187.72 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2000 | 0.94x | $20.27 Million | $21.62 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 1999 | 1.00x | $18.20 Million | $18.29 Million | ▲ +102.0% |
| 1998 | 0.49x | $6.80 Million | $13.80 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 1997 | 0.92x | $9.50 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +118.7% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $3.50 Million | $8.30 Million | ▲ +285.5% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $700.00K | $6.40 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 1994 | 0.40x | $1.60 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1993 | 0.43x | $1.00 Million | $2.30 Million | — |