ResMed Inc (RMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ResMed Inc (RMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $554.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.29 Billion) in one year. See ResMed Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ResMed Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ResMed Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of ResMed Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ResMed Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ResMed Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is ResMed Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | $1.75 Billion | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2024 | 0.70x | $1.40 Billion | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +163.9% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | $693.30 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $351.15 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $736.72 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $802.25 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $459.05 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2018 | 0.50x | $505.03 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | $414.05 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2016 | 0.35x | $547.93 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2015 | 0.64x | $383.18 Million | $596.95 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.65x | $391.27 Million | $602.71 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0.67x | $402.82 Million | $600.21 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2012 | 0.72x | $383.16 Million | $530.24 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | $283.19 Million | $338.19 Million | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2010 | 0.56x | $188.21 Million | $338.86 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2009 | 0.61x | $238.88 Million | $392.78 Million | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $137.84 Million | $324.23 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $91.11 Million | $320.82 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $99.03 Million | $269.07 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $71.08 Million | $300.08 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $76.54 Million | $187.65 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $59.28 Million | $173.16 Million | ▲ +76.0% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $35.64 Million | $183.26 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $29.52 Million | $187.72 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2000 | 0.94x | $20.27 Million | $21.62 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 1999 | 1.00x | $18.20 Million | $18.29 Million | ▲ +102.0% |
| 1998 | 0.49x | $6.80 Million | $13.80 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 1997 | 0.92x | $9.50 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +118.7% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $3.50 Million | $8.30 Million | ▲ +285.5% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $700.00K | $6.40 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 1994 | 0.40x | $1.60 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1993 | 0.43x | $1.00 Million | $2.30 Million | — |