Skechers USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Skechers USA Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Skechers USA Inc (SKX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $553.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.90 Billion) in one year. Check Skechers USA Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Skechers USA Inc (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Skechers USA Inc from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Skechers USA Inc across 27 annual periods. Check SKX cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Skechers USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Skechers USA Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Skechers USA Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Skechers USA Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | $687.39 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2023 | 0.39x | $1.23 Billion | $3.15 Billion | ▲ +396.0% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $238.32 Million | $3.02 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $212.15 Million | $2.95 Billion | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $331.45 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $426.55 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | $568.55 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +170.2% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $159.34 Million | $786.87 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $361.62 Million | $708.16 Million | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $232.21 Million | $671.67 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $163.88 Million | $540.81 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $98.98 Million | $428.65 Million | ▲ +2921.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-3.45 Million | $421.13 Million | ▼ -101.9% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $164.92 Million | $389.36 Million | ▲ +420.9% |
| 2010 | -0.13x | $-47.38 Million | $358.96 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $115.11 Million | $246.18 Million | ▲ +537.9% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | $-21.83 Million | $204.42 Million | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $101.36 Million | $201.31 Million | ▲ +456.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $26.04 Million | $287.96 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $75.90 Million | $238.13 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $33.05 Million | $223.76 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $12.32 Million | $210.88 Million | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $116.81 Million | $223.92 Million | ▲ +6422.9% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-1.72 Million | $208.47 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-1.01 Million | $169.35 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $13.10 Million | $91.90 Million | ▲ +492.8% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-4.30 Million | $118.50 Million | — |