Skechers USA Inc (SKX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Skechers USA Inc (SKX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $553.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.90 Billion) in one year. See Skechers USA Inc free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Skechers USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Skechers USA Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Skechers USA Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Skechers USA Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Skechers USA Inc. Check Skechers USA Inc (SKX) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | $687.39 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2023 | 0.39x | $1.23 Billion | $3.15 Billion | ▲ +396.0% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $238.32 Million | $3.02 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $212.15 Million | $2.95 Billion | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $331.45 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $426.55 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | $568.55 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +170.2% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $159.34 Million | $786.87 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $361.62 Million | $708.16 Million | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $232.21 Million | $671.67 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $163.88 Million | $540.81 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $98.98 Million | $428.65 Million | ▲ +2921.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-3.45 Million | $421.13 Million | ▼ -101.9% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $164.92 Million | $389.36 Million | ▲ +420.9% |
| 2010 | -0.13x | $-47.38 Million | $358.96 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $115.11 Million | $246.18 Million | ▲ +537.9% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | $-21.83 Million | $204.42 Million | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $101.36 Million | $201.31 Million | ▲ +456.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $26.04 Million | $287.96 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $75.90 Million | $238.13 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $33.05 Million | $223.76 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $12.32 Million | $210.88 Million | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $116.81 Million | $223.92 Million | ▲ +6422.9% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-1.72 Million | $208.47 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-1.01 Million | $169.35 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $13.10 Million | $91.90 Million | ▲ +492.8% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-4.30 Million | $118.50 Million | — |