Skechers USA Inc (SKX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Skechers USA Inc (SKX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $553.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.90 Billion) in one year. See Skechers USA Inc (SKX) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Skechers USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Skechers USA Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore Skechers USA Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Skechers USA Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Skechers USA Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Skechers USA Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | $687.39 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2023 | 0.39x | $1.23 Billion | $3.15 Billion | ▲ +396.0% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $238.32 Million | $3.02 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $212.15 Million | $2.95 Billion | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $331.45 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $426.55 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | $568.55 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +170.2% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $159.34 Million | $786.87 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $361.62 Million | $708.16 Million | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $232.21 Million | $671.67 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $163.88 Million | $540.81 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $98.98 Million | $428.65 Million | ▲ +2921.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-3.45 Million | $421.13 Million | ▼ -101.9% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $164.92 Million | $389.36 Million | ▲ +420.9% |
| 2010 | -0.13x | $-47.38 Million | $358.96 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $115.11 Million | $246.18 Million | ▲ +537.9% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | $-21.83 Million | $204.42 Million | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $101.36 Million | $201.31 Million | ▲ +456.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $26.04 Million | $287.96 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $75.90 Million | $238.13 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $33.05 Million | $223.76 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $12.32 Million | $210.88 Million | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $116.81 Million | $223.92 Million | ▲ +6422.9% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-1.72 Million | $208.47 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-1.01 Million | $169.35 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $13.10 Million | $91.90 Million | ▲ +492.8% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-4.30 Million | $118.50 Million | — |