Skechers USA Inc (SKX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Skechers USA Inc (SKX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $553.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.90 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Skechers USA Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Skechers USA Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Skechers USA Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Skechers USA Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Skechers USA Inc (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Skechers USA Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Skechers USA Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | $687.39 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2023 | 0.39x | $1.23 Billion | $3.15 Billion | ▲ +396.0% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $238.32 Million | $3.02 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $212.15 Million | $2.95 Billion | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $331.45 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $426.55 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | $568.55 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +170.2% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $159.34 Million | $786.87 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $361.62 Million | $708.16 Million | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $232.21 Million | $671.67 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $163.88 Million | $540.81 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $98.98 Million | $428.65 Million | ▲ +2921.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-3.45 Million | $421.13 Million | ▼ -101.9% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $164.92 Million | $389.36 Million | ▲ +420.9% |
| 2010 | -0.13x | $-47.38 Million | $358.96 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $115.11 Million | $246.18 Million | ▲ +537.9% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | $-21.83 Million | $204.42 Million | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $101.36 Million | $201.31 Million | ▲ +456.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $26.04 Million | $287.96 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $75.90 Million | $238.13 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $33.05 Million | $223.76 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $12.32 Million | $210.88 Million | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $116.81 Million | $223.92 Million | ▲ +6422.9% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-1.72 Million | $208.47 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-1.01 Million | $169.35 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $13.10 Million | $91.90 Million | ▲ +492.8% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-4.30 Million | $118.50 Million | — |