SM Energy Co (SM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SM Energy Co (SM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $640.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.28 Billion) in one year. Explore SM Energy Co strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SM Energy Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SM Energy Co across 36 annual periods. Also explore how large is SM Energy Co's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SM Energy Co (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SM Energy Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | $2.01 Billion | $4.44 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2024 | 0.41x | $1.78 Billion | $4.34 Billion | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2023 | 0.57x | $1.57 Billion | $2.76 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2022 | 0.64x | $1.69 Billion | $2.63 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2021 | 0.37x | $1.16 Billion | $3.17 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $790.94 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $823.57 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $720.63 Million | $3.43 Billion | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $515.39 Million | $3.78 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $552.80 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $978.35 Million | $3.77 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $1.46 Billion | $4.23 Billion | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2013 | 0.43x | $1.34 Billion | $3.10 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2012 | 0.33x | $921.97 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | $760.53 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $497.10 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2009 | 0.31x | $436.11 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $678.22 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | $630.79 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2006 | 0.40x | $467.70 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2005 | 0.59x | $409.38 Million | $699.43 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2004 | 0.51x | $237.16 Million | $461.00 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2003 | 0.59x | $204.32 Million | $345.20 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2002 | 0.60x | $141.71 Million | $236.98 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2001 | 0.85x | $127.49 Million | $150.16 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2000 | 1.30x | $92.27 Million | $71.15 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 1999 | 0.99x | $40.80 Million | $41.30 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 1998 | 0.91x | $45.40 Million | $49.80 Million | ▲ +33.5% |
| 1997 | 0.68x | $43.10 Million | $63.10 Million | ▲ +95.0% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $24.20 Million | $69.10 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1995 | 0.59x | $17.70 Million | $29.80 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 1994 | 0.87x | $20.30 Million | $23.40 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1993 | 1.08x | $19.70 Million | $18.20 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 1992 | 1.86x | $27.00 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +261.3% |
| 1991 | 0.52x | $11.70 Million | $22.70 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 1990 | 1.18x | $15.10 Million | $12.80 Million | — |