Snap-On Inc (SNA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Snap-On Inc (SNA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $268.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.46 Billion) in one year. See SNA free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Snap-On Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Snap-On Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore Snap-On Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Snap-On Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Snap-On Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Snap-On Inc (SNA) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | $1.08 Billion | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2024 | 0.49x | $1.22 Billion | $2.48 Billion | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2023 | 0.47x | $1.15 Billion | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $675.20 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | $966.60 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $1.01 Billion | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $674.60 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2018 | 0.34x | $764.50 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2017 | 0.27x | $608.50 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $567.30 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $496.50 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $397.90 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $392.60 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $329.30 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▲ +161.5% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $128.50 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $140.40 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $347.10 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $215.00 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $231.10 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | $203.40 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $221.10 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $146.80 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $177.00 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $224.10 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $163.70 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $190.20 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $235.60 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +116.4% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $75.00 Million | $912.60 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $194.90 Million | $749.30 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $129.70 Million | $692.60 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $172.90 Million | $610.30 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 1994 | 0.23x | $107.20 Million | $468.50 Million | ▲ +302.5% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $29.40 Million | $517.20 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1992 | 0.19x | $99.90 Million | $512.70 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 1991 | 0.50x | $132.00 Million | $262.70 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $39.10 Million | $271.50 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 1989 | 0.30x | $61.20 Million | $204.90 Million | — |