Suburban Propane Partners LP (SPH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Suburban Propane Partners LP (SPH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $139.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.64 Billion) in one year. See SPH financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Suburban Propane Partners LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Suburban Propane Partners LP across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SPH cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Suburban Propane Partners LP (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Suburban Propane Partners LP. Check SPH cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $186.26 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $160.59 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $225.24 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $220.55 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $226.55 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $209.35 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $226.78 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $210.41 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $160.36 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $157.11 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $324.21 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $225.55 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $214.31 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +116.5% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $110.97 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $132.79 Million | $598.24 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $155.80 Million | $605.42 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $246.55 Million | $617.80 Million | ▲ +170.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $120.52 Million | $815.64 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $145.96 Million | $808.94 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $170.32 Million | $853.18 Million | ▲ +355.2% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $39.01 Million | $889.48 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $93.06 Million | $823.89 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $57.30 Million | $581.55 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $68.78 Million | $680.86 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $101.84 Million | $664.06 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $59.47 Million | $709.29 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $81.80 Million | $590.80 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $70.10 Million | $581.80 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $58.80 Million | $635.20 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $59.20 Million | $642.70 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $53.70 Million | $178.20 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 1994 | 0.39x | $77.10 Million | $195.50 Million | — |