Suburban Propane Partners LP (SPH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Suburban Propane Partners LP (SPH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $116.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.68 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Suburban Propane Partners LP to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Suburban Propane Partners LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Suburban Propane Partners LP across 32 annual periods. Also explore Suburban Propane Partners LP asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Suburban Propane Partners LP (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Suburban Propane Partners LP. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SPH market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $186.26 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $160.59 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $225.24 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $220.55 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $226.55 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $209.35 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $226.78 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $210.41 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $160.36 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $157.11 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $324.21 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $225.55 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $214.31 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +116.5% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $110.97 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $132.79 Million | $598.24 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $155.80 Million | $605.42 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $246.55 Million | $617.80 Million | ▲ +170.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $120.52 Million | $815.64 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $145.96 Million | $808.94 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $170.32 Million | $853.18 Million | ▲ +355.2% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $39.01 Million | $889.48 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $93.06 Million | $823.89 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $57.30 Million | $581.55 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $68.78 Million | $680.86 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $101.84 Million | $664.06 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $59.47 Million | $709.29 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $81.80 Million | $590.80 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $70.10 Million | $581.80 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $58.80 Million | $635.20 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $59.20 Million | $642.70 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $53.70 Million | $178.20 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 1994 | 0.39x | $77.10 Million | $195.50 Million | — |