Suburban Propane Partners LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Suburban Propane Partners LP cash flow-to-debt ratio. Suburban Propane Partners LP (SPH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $139.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.64 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Suburban Propane Partners LP to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Suburban Propane Partners LP (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Suburban Propane Partners LP from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Suburban Propane Partners LP across 32 annual periods. Check Suburban Propane Partners LP total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Suburban Propane Partners LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Suburban Propane Partners LP cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Suburban Propane Partners LP. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Suburban Propane Partners LP operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $186.26 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $160.59 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $225.24 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $220.55 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $226.55 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $209.35 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $226.78 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $210.41 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $160.36 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $157.11 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $324.21 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $225.55 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $214.31 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +116.5% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $110.97 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $132.79 Million | $598.24 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $155.80 Million | $605.42 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $246.55 Million | $617.80 Million | ▲ +170.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $120.52 Million | $815.64 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $145.96 Million | $808.94 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $170.32 Million | $853.18 Million | ▲ +355.2% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $39.01 Million | $889.48 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $93.06 Million | $823.89 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $57.30 Million | $581.55 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $68.78 Million | $680.86 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $101.84 Million | $664.06 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $59.47 Million | $709.29 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $81.80 Million | $590.80 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $70.10 Million | $581.80 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $58.80 Million | $635.20 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $59.20 Million | $642.70 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $53.70 Million | $178.20 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 1994 | 0.39x | $77.10 Million | $195.50 Million | — |