Suburban Propane Partners LP (SPH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Suburban Propane Partners LP (SPH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $116.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.68 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Suburban Propane Partners LP to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Suburban Propane Partners LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Suburban Propane Partners LP across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Suburban Propane Partners LP to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Suburban Propane Partners LP (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Suburban Propane Partners LP. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SPH market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $186.26 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $160.59 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $225.24 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $220.55 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $226.55 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $209.35 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $226.78 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $210.41 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $160.36 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $157.11 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $324.21 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $225.55 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $214.31 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +116.5% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $110.97 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $132.79 Million | $598.24 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $155.80 Million | $605.42 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $246.55 Million | $617.80 Million | ▲ +170.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $120.52 Million | $815.64 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $145.96 Million | $808.94 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $170.32 Million | $853.18 Million | ▲ +355.2% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $39.01 Million | $889.48 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $93.06 Million | $823.89 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $57.30 Million | $581.55 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $68.78 Million | $680.86 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $101.84 Million | $664.06 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $59.47 Million | $709.29 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $81.80 Million | $590.80 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $70.10 Million | $581.80 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $58.80 Million | $635.20 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $59.20 Million | $642.70 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $53.70 Million | $178.20 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 1994 | 0.39x | $77.10 Million | $195.50 Million | — |