Spire Inc (SR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Spire Inc (SR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $81.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.63 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Spire Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Spire Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Spire Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore Spire Inc (SR) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Spire Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Spire Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Spire Inc (SR) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $578.00 Million | $8.18 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $912.40 Million | $7.62 Billion | ▲ +100.8% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $440.20 Million | $7.38 Billion | ▲ +686.5% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $55.00 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $249.80 Million | $6.69 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $469.90 Million | $5.72 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $450.90 Million | $5.08 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $456.60 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▲ +209.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $288.30 Million | $4.56 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $328.30 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $322.40 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▲ +152.3% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $122.60 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $163.91 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $128.10 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $167.19 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $106.92 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $228.75 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +746.7% |
| 2008 | -0.03x | $-36.53 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -142.4% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $81.29 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +1052.1% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-8.22 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -107.0% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $103.09 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $84.12 Million | $908.27 Million | ▲ +1024.2% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-9.03 Million | $901.07 Million | ▼ -109.5% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $83.84 Million | $794.84 Million | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $37.90 Million | $686.24 Million | ▲ +1073.1% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $3.05 Million | $646.99 Million | ▼ -94.0% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $43.10 Million | $547.30 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $48.90 Million | $512.30 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $54.10 Million | $468.30 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $41.30 Million | $446.60 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $28.20 Million | $407.40 Million | ▼ -34.8% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $43.70 Million | $411.40 Million | — |