Stoneridge Inc (SRI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Stoneridge Inc (SRI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($371.41 Million) in one year. See SRI financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Stoneridge Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Stoneridge Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Stoneridge Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Stoneridge Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Stoneridge Inc. Check earnings quality score of Stoneridge Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $34.02 Million | $371.41 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $47.75 Million | $376.30 Million | ▲ +906.1% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $4.95 Million | $392.18 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $6.81 Million | $371.16 Million | ▲ +118.7% |
| 2021 | -0.10x | $-36.25 Million | $369.45 Million | ▼ -211.3% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $28.64 Million | $324.77 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $24.50 Million | $312.31 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $80.77 Million | $276.25 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $78.91 Million | $314.96 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $65.28 Million | $202.45 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $54.80 Million | $257.82 Million | ▲ +205.7% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $19.82 Million | $284.94 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $43.68 Million | $399.79 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $75.55 Million | $398.86 Million | ▲ +10544.6% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $921.00K | $517.61 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $13.85 Million | $295.52 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $13.82 Million | $288.47 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $42.46 Million | $290.68 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $33.52 Million | $321.58 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $46.54 Million | $323.19 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $19.06 Million | $308.12 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $48.28 Million | $318.97 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $72.35 Million | $336.26 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $95.62 Million | $355.23 Million | ▲ +75.0% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $62.65 Million | $407.24 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $52.40 Million | $434.81 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $44.20 Million | $466.70 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $46.00 Million | $447.60 Million | ▼ -87.5% |
| 1997 | 0.82x | $63.80 Million | $77.90 Million | ▲ +204.0% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $25.30 Million | $93.90 Million | — |