Stoneridge Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Stoneridge Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Stoneridge Inc (SRI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($371.41 Million) in one year. Check SRI cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Stoneridge Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Stoneridge Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Stoneridge Inc across 30 annual periods. Check SRI operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Stoneridge Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Stoneridge Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Stoneridge Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SRI operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $34.02 Million | $371.41 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $47.75 Million | $376.30 Million | ▲ +906.1% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $4.95 Million | $392.18 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $6.81 Million | $371.16 Million | ▲ +118.7% |
| 2021 | -0.10x | $-36.25 Million | $369.45 Million | ▼ -211.3% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $28.64 Million | $324.77 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $24.50 Million | $312.31 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $80.77 Million | $276.25 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $78.91 Million | $314.96 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $65.28 Million | $202.45 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $54.80 Million | $257.82 Million | ▲ +205.7% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $19.82 Million | $284.94 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $43.68 Million | $399.79 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $75.55 Million | $398.86 Million | ▲ +10544.6% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $921.00K | $517.61 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $13.85 Million | $295.52 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $13.82 Million | $288.47 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $42.46 Million | $290.68 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $33.52 Million | $321.58 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $46.54 Million | $323.19 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $19.06 Million | $308.12 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $48.28 Million | $318.97 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $72.35 Million | $336.26 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $95.62 Million | $355.23 Million | ▲ +75.0% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $62.65 Million | $407.24 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $52.40 Million | $434.81 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $44.20 Million | $466.70 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $46.00 Million | $447.60 Million | ▼ -87.5% |
| 1997 | 0.82x | $63.80 Million | $77.90 Million | ▲ +204.0% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $25.30 Million | $93.90 Million | — |