Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $234.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.79 Billion) in one year. Explore TDY strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated across 28 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Teledyne Technologies Incorporated for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TDY company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $1.19 Billion | $4.77 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $1.19 Billion | $4.65 Billion | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $836.10 Million | $5.30 Billion | ▲ +100.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $486.80 Million | $6.18 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $824.60 Million | $6.82 Billion | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | $618.90 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $482.10 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $446.90 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $374.70 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $317.00 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $210.20 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2014 | 0.21x | $287.90 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $204.10 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $189.50 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $216.60 Million | $842.00 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $141.80 Million | $770.80 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $154.90 Million | $754.10 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $120.40 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $166.70 Million | $629.20 Million | ▲ +112.8% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $78.40 Million | $629.60 Million | ▼ -45.7% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $92.30 Million | $402.20 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $84.90 Million | $362.70 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $56.70 Million | $207.10 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | $73.30 Million | $214.30 Million | ▲ +240.7% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $17.70 Million | $176.30 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $38.00 Million | $187.80 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $47.40 Million | $268.90 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 1998 | 0.46x | $67.10 Million | $144.40 Million | — |