Team Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Team Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Team Inc (TISI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($457.98 Million) in one year. Check how high is Team Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Team Inc (1987–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Team Inc from 1987 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Team Inc across 39 annual periods. Check TISI cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Team Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1987–2025)
Team Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1987 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Team Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TISI cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-11.35 Million | $457.98 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | $22.77 Million | $526.63 Million | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-10.99 Million | $520.15 Million | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-53.21 Million | $498.88 Million | ▼ -97.0% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-35.45 Million | $654.68 Million | ▼ -153.0% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $52.76 Million | $516.37 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $58.84 Million | $548.55 Million | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $41.86 Million | $520.72 Million | ▲ +450.4% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-13.73 Million | $598.37 Million | ▼ -117.6% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $79.56 Million | $611.78 Million | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $43.47 Million | $167.90 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $52.86 Million | $167.90 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | $58.64 Million | $168.01 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $36.65 Million | $158.79 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $28.48 Million | $146.04 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $43.80 Million | $99.80 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.30x | $38.96 Million | $129.42 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $24.73 Million | $153.48 Million | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $6.73 Million | $86.54 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $7.37 Million | $75.82 Million | ▲ +413.5% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-2.92 Million | $94.01 Million | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $2.62 Million | $31.86 Million | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $6.57 Million | $20.27 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $5.28 Million | $22.83 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $4.59 Million | $23.18 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $3.93 Million | $26.29 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $3.20 Million | $26.70 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $1.70 Million | $18.40 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $3.90 Million | $12.10 Million | ▲ +395.3% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $3.80 Million | $58.40 Million | ▲ +432.6% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $700.00K | $57.30 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $700.00K | $59.80 Million | ▼ -79.1% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $4.30 Million | $76.90 Million | ▼ -53.3% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $3.90 Million | $32.60 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 1991 | 0.20x | $7.90 Million | $39.50 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 1990 | 0.10x | $3.50 Million | $34.30 Million | ▲ +824.5% |
| 1989 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $28.40 Million | ▼ -105.7% |
| 1988 | 0.25x | $6.40 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 1987 | 0.51x | $15.80 Million | $30.80 Million | — |