Team Inc (TISI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Team Inc (TISI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($457.98 Million) in one year. Check Team Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Team Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Team Inc across 39 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Team Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Team Inc (1987–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Team Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Team Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-11.35 Million | $457.98 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | $22.77 Million | $526.63 Million | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-10.99 Million | $520.15 Million | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-53.21 Million | $498.88 Million | ▼ -97.0% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-35.45 Million | $654.68 Million | ▼ -153.0% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $52.76 Million | $516.37 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $58.84 Million | $548.55 Million | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $41.86 Million | $520.72 Million | ▲ +450.4% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-13.73 Million | $598.37 Million | ▼ -117.6% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $79.56 Million | $611.78 Million | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $43.47 Million | $167.90 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $52.86 Million | $167.90 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | $58.64 Million | $168.01 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $36.65 Million | $158.79 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $28.48 Million | $146.04 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $43.80 Million | $99.80 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.30x | $38.96 Million | $129.42 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $24.73 Million | $153.48 Million | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $6.73 Million | $86.54 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $7.37 Million | $75.82 Million | ▲ +413.5% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-2.92 Million | $94.01 Million | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $2.62 Million | $31.86 Million | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $6.57 Million | $20.27 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $5.28 Million | $22.83 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $4.59 Million | $23.18 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $3.93 Million | $26.29 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $3.20 Million | $26.70 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $1.70 Million | $18.40 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $3.90 Million | $12.10 Million | ▲ +395.3% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $3.80 Million | $58.40 Million | ▲ +432.6% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $700.00K | $57.30 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $700.00K | $59.80 Million | ▼ -79.1% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $4.30 Million | $76.90 Million | ▼ -53.3% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $3.90 Million | $32.60 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 1991 | 0.20x | $7.90 Million | $39.50 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 1990 | 0.10x | $3.50 Million | $34.30 Million | ▲ +824.5% |
| 1989 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $28.40 Million | ▼ -105.7% |
| 1988 | 0.25x | $6.40 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 1987 | 0.51x | $15.80 Million | $30.80 Million | — |