Teekay Corporation (TK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Teekay Corporation (TK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.53x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $301.77 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($197.47 Million) in one year. Explore Teekay Corporation long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Teekay Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Teekay Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Teekay Corporation (TK) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Teekay Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Teekay Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Teekay Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.29x | $301.77 Million | $234.22 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2024 | 2.14x | $467.19 Million | $217.95 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2023 | 1.59x | $629.82 Million | $396.29 Million | ▲ +534.6% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $199.15 Million | $795.24 Million | ▲ +1251.1% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $75.99 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▼ -91.6% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $984.02 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▲ +216.0% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $383.31 Million | $5.51 Billion | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $182.13 Million | $5.52 Billion | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $513.75 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $624.63 Million | $8.73 Billion | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $770.33 Million | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $446.32 Million | $8.39 Billion | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $291.96 Million | $8.35 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $289.56 Million | $7.81 Billion | ▲ +170.9% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $107.19 Million | $7.83 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $411.75 Million | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $338.10 Million | $6.42 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $431.85 Million | $7.56 Billion | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $255.02 Million | $7.22 Billion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $545.72 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $609.04 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | $814.70 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $455.57 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $214.44 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | $520.15 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | $333.25 Million | $871.02 Million | ▲ +753.0% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $51.51 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -81.2% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $161.12 Million | $674.82 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $139.16 Million | $770.73 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $102.65 Million | $743.00 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $87.50 Million | $755.90 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $87.50 Million | $867.40 Million | — |