Teekay Corporation (TK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Teekay Corporation (TK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.53x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $301.77 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($197.47 Million) in one year. See TK free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Teekay Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Teekay Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Teekay Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Teekay Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Teekay Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Teekay Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.29x | $301.77 Million | $234.22 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2024 | 2.14x | $467.19 Million | $217.95 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2023 | 1.59x | $629.82 Million | $396.29 Million | ▲ +534.6% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $199.15 Million | $795.24 Million | ▲ +1251.1% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $75.99 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▼ -91.6% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $984.02 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▲ +216.0% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $383.31 Million | $5.51 Billion | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $182.13 Million | $5.52 Billion | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $513.75 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $624.63 Million | $8.73 Billion | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $770.33 Million | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $446.32 Million | $8.39 Billion | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $291.96 Million | $8.35 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $289.56 Million | $7.81 Billion | ▲ +170.9% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $107.19 Million | $7.83 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $411.75 Million | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $338.10 Million | $6.42 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $431.85 Million | $7.56 Billion | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $255.02 Million | $7.22 Billion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $545.72 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $609.04 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | $814.70 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $455.57 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $214.44 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | $520.15 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | $333.25 Million | $871.02 Million | ▲ +753.0% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $51.51 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -81.2% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $161.12 Million | $674.82 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $139.16 Million | $770.73 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $102.65 Million | $743.00 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $87.50 Million | $755.90 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $87.50 Million | $867.40 Million | — |