Teekay Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Teekay Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Teekay Corporation (TK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.53x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $301.77 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($197.47 Million) in one year. Check how high is Teekay Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Teekay Corporation (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Teekay Corporation from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Teekay Corporation across 32 annual periods. Check Teekay Corporation (TK) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Teekay Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Teekay Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Teekay Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Teekay Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.29x | $301.77 Million | $234.22 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2024 | 2.14x | $467.19 Million | $217.95 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2023 | 1.59x | $629.82 Million | $396.29 Million | ▲ +534.6% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $199.15 Million | $795.24 Million | ▲ +1251.1% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $75.99 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▼ -91.6% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $984.02 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▲ +216.0% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $383.31 Million | $5.51 Billion | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $182.13 Million | $5.52 Billion | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $513.75 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $624.63 Million | $8.73 Billion | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $770.33 Million | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $446.32 Million | $8.39 Billion | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $291.96 Million | $8.35 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $289.56 Million | $7.81 Billion | ▲ +170.9% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | $107.19 Million | $7.83 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $411.75 Million | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $338.10 Million | $6.42 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $431.85 Million | $7.56 Billion | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $255.02 Million | $7.22 Billion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $545.72 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $609.04 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | $814.70 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $455.57 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $214.44 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | $520.15 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | $333.25 Million | $871.02 Million | ▲ +753.0% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $51.51 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -81.2% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $161.12 Million | $674.82 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $139.16 Million | $770.73 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $102.65 Million | $743.00 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $87.50 Million | $755.90 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $87.50 Million | $867.40 Million | — |