Teekay Corporation (TK) — Net Asset Quality Index
Teekay Corporation (TK) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 91.6% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $2.36 Billion minus total liabilities of $197.47 Million yields net assets of $2.16 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See TK defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Teekay Corporation Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1994–2025)
This chart shows how Teekay Corporation's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 32 annual periods from 1994 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 91.6%, representing net assets of $2.16 Billion against total assets of $2.36 Billion USD. Explore TK cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Teekay Corporation (1994–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Teekay Corporation from 1994 to 2025, covering 32 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Teekay Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 90.2% | $2.16 Billion | $2.40 Billion | $234.22 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2024 | 89.9% | $1.94 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $217.95 Million | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2023 | 82.0% | $1.80 Billion | $2.20 Billion | $396.29 Million | ▲ +18.7 pp |
| 2022 | 63.3% | $1.37 Billion | $2.16 Billion | $795.24 Million | ▲ +26.0 pp |
| 2021 | 37.2% | $2.43 Billion | $6.53 Billion | $4.10 Billion | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2020 | 35.6% | $2.47 Billion | $6.95 Billion | $4.47 Billion | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2019 | 31.8% | $2.57 Billion | $8.08 Billion | $5.51 Billion | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2018 | 34.2% | $2.87 Billion | $8.39 Billion | $5.52 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2017 | 35.6% | $2.88 Billion | $8.09 Billion | $5.21 Billion | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2016 | 31.9% | $4.09 Billion | $12.81 Billion | $8.73 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2015 | 28.3% | $3.70 Billion | $13.06 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 28.8% | $3.39 Billion | $11.78 Billion | $8.39 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 27.7% | $3.20 Billion | $11.56 Billion | $8.35 Billion | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2012 | 29.0% | $3.19 Billion | $11.00 Billion | $7.81 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2011 | 29.7% | $3.30 Billion | $11.14 Billion | $7.83 Billion | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2010 | 34.0% | $3.37 Billion | $9.91 Billion | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2009 | 32.5% | $3.10 Billion | $9.52 Billion | $6.42 Billion | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2008 | 26.0% | $2.65 Billion | $10.22 Billion | $7.56 Billion | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2007 | 30.7% | $3.20 Billion | $10.42 Billion | $7.22 Billion | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2006 | 38.7% | $2.98 Billion | $7.72 Billion | $4.73 Billion | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2005 | 47.6% | $2.52 Billion | $5.29 Billion | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2004 | 40.9% | $2.25 Billion | $5.50 Billion | $3.25 Billion | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2003 | 46.5% | $1.67 Billion | $3.59 Billion | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2002 | 53.0% | $1.44 Billion | $2.72 Billion | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 2001 | 57.4% | $1.42 Billion | $2.47 Billion | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2000 | 55.9% | $1.10 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $871.02 Million | ▲ +13.8 pp |
| 1999 | 42.1% | $834.17 Million | $1.98 Billion | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 1998 | 53.5% | $777.40 Million | $1.45 Billion | $674.82 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 1997 | 47.2% | $689.46 Million | $1.46 Billion | $770.73 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 1996 | 45.9% | $629.80 Million | $1.37 Billion | $743.00 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 1995 | 44.2% | $599.40 Million | $1.36 Billion | $755.90 Million | ▲ +10.6 pp |
| 1994 | 33.6% | $439.10 Million | $1.31 Billion | $867.40 Million | — |