Texas Pacific Land Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Texas Pacific Land Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.79x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $334.87 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($187.08 Million) in one year. Check Texas Pacific Land Corporation cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Texas Pacific Land Corporation (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Texas Pacific Land Corporation from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Texas Pacific Land Corporation across 31 annual periods. Check TPL cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Texas Pacific Land Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Texas Pacific Land Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Texas Pacific Land Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.32x | $545.91 Million | $164.37 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2024 | 4.25x | $490.67 Million | $115.56 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2023 | 3.70x | $418.29 Million | $113.20 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2022 | 4.28x | $447.15 Million | $104.54 Million | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2021 | 2.36x | $265.16 Million | $112.35 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2020 | 2.39x | $207.04 Million | $86.45 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2019 | 3.98x | $342.79 Million | $86.04 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2018 | 4.84x | $195.45 Million | $40.38 Million | ▲ +149.0% |
| 2017 | 1.94x | $93.83 Million | $48.27 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2016 | 2.76x | $40.96 Million | $14.83 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2015 | 10.44x | $49.57 Million | $4.75 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2014 | 6.09x | $38.85 Million | $6.38 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2013 | 6.79x | $30.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +90.7% |
| 2012 | 3.56x | $19.91 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2011 | 3.48x | $23.93 Million | $6.89 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2010 | 1.75x | $11.70 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2009 | 1.33x | $9.39 Million | $7.08 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2008 | 1.58x | $11.44 Million | $7.26 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2007 | 1.23x | $9.53 Million | $7.77 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2006 | 1.29x | $10.37 Million | $8.03 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2005 | 1.34x | $10.33 Million | $7.69 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2004 | 1.20x | $10.16 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2003 | 1.50x | $6.52 Million | $4.33 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2002 | 1.04x | $4.92 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2001 | 1.37x | $6.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2000 | 0.99x | $4.02 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 1999 | 1.00x | $4.15 Million | $4.13 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $5.34 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1997 | 1.08x | $4.79 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1996 | 0.92x | $3.29 Million | $3.58 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1995 | 1.31x | $4.71 Million | $3.61 Million | — |