Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.83x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $162.01 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($195.51 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Texas Pacific Land Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Texas Pacific Land Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Texas Pacific Land Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Texas Pacific Land Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Texas Pacific Land Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Texas Pacific Land Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.32x | $545.91 Million | $164.37 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2024 | 4.25x | $490.67 Million | $115.56 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2023 | 3.70x | $418.29 Million | $113.20 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2022 | 4.28x | $447.15 Million | $104.54 Million | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2021 | 2.36x | $265.16 Million | $112.35 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2020 | 2.39x | $207.04 Million | $86.45 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2019 | 3.98x | $342.79 Million | $86.04 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2018 | 4.84x | $195.45 Million | $40.38 Million | ▲ +149.0% |
| 2017 | 1.94x | $93.83 Million | $48.27 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2016 | 2.76x | $40.96 Million | $14.83 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2015 | 10.44x | $49.57 Million | $4.75 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2014 | 6.09x | $38.85 Million | $6.38 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2013 | 6.79x | $30.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +90.7% |
| 2012 | 3.56x | $19.91 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2011 | 3.48x | $23.93 Million | $6.89 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2010 | 1.75x | $11.70 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2009 | 1.33x | $9.39 Million | $7.08 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2008 | 1.58x | $11.44 Million | $7.26 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2007 | 1.23x | $9.53 Million | $7.77 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2006 | 1.29x | $10.37 Million | $8.03 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2005 | 1.34x | $10.33 Million | $7.69 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2004 | 1.20x | $10.16 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2003 | 1.50x | $6.52 Million | $4.33 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2002 | 1.04x | $4.92 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2001 | 1.37x | $6.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2000 | 0.99x | $4.02 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 1999 | 1.00x | $4.15 Million | $4.13 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $5.34 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1997 | 1.08x | $4.79 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1996 | 0.92x | $3.29 Million | $3.58 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1995 | 1.31x | $4.71 Million | $3.61 Million | — |