Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.79x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $334.87 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($187.08 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Texas Pacific Land Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Texas Pacific Land Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Texas Pacific Land Corporation across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Texas Pacific Land Corporation generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Texas Pacific Land Corporation. Check Texas Pacific Land Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.32x | $545.91 Million | $164.37 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2024 | 4.25x | $490.67 Million | $115.56 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2023 | 3.70x | $418.29 Million | $113.20 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2022 | 4.28x | $447.15 Million | $104.54 Million | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2021 | 2.36x | $265.16 Million | $112.35 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2020 | 2.39x | $207.04 Million | $86.45 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2019 | 3.98x | $342.79 Million | $86.04 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2018 | 4.84x | $195.45 Million | $40.38 Million | ▲ +149.0% |
| 2017 | 1.94x | $93.83 Million | $48.27 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2016 | 2.76x | $40.96 Million | $14.83 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2015 | 10.44x | $49.57 Million | $4.75 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2014 | 6.09x | $38.85 Million | $6.38 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2013 | 6.79x | $30.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +90.7% |
| 2012 | 3.56x | $19.91 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2011 | 3.48x | $23.93 Million | $6.89 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2010 | 1.75x | $11.70 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2009 | 1.33x | $9.39 Million | $7.08 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2008 | 1.58x | $11.44 Million | $7.26 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2007 | 1.23x | $9.53 Million | $7.77 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2006 | 1.29x | $10.37 Million | $8.03 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2005 | 1.34x | $10.33 Million | $7.69 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2004 | 1.20x | $10.16 Million | $8.44 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2003 | 1.50x | $6.52 Million | $4.33 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2002 | 1.04x | $4.92 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2001 | 1.37x | $6.07 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2000 | 0.99x | $4.02 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 1999 | 1.00x | $4.15 Million | $4.13 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1998 | 1.02x | $5.34 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1997 | 1.08x | $4.79 Million | $4.45 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1996 | 0.92x | $3.29 Million | $3.58 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1995 | 1.31x | $4.71 Million | $3.61 Million | — |