Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($304.75 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2004–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund across 22 annual periods. Also explore Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (2004–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu (TYG) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $35.72 Million | $304.75 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $12.52 Million | $130.17 Million | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2023 | 0.81x | $90.68 Million | $112.15 Million | ▲ +223.4% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $44.18 Million | $176.70 Million | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $23.04 Million | $154.30 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2020 | 3.59x | $538.80 Million | $150.21 Million | ▲ +885.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $166.80 Million | $458.46 Million | ▲ +473.6% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $55.57 Million | $876.04 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $144.06 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +308.6% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $39.52 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $36.56 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +146.4% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-113.67 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-27.94 Million | $942.97 Million | ▼ -183.1% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $25.27 Million | $708.85 Million | ▲ +1693.5% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $1.10 Million | $553.50 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-59.30 Million | $485.60 Million | ▼ -175.2% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $51.40 Million | $316.70 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2008 | 0.55x | $118.20 Million | $215.20 Million | ▲ +219.3% |
| 2007 | -0.46x | $-210.90 Million | $458.20 Million | ▼ -206.2% |
| 2006 | -0.15x | $-49.00 Million | $326.00 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2005 | -0.53x | $-118.20 Million | $221.70 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2004 | -2.94x | $-433.90 Million | $147.40 Million | — |