Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($304.75 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2004–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund across 22 annual periods. Also explore TYG net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (2004–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu (TYG) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $35.72 Million | $304.75 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $12.52 Million | $130.17 Million | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2023 | 0.81x | $90.68 Million | $112.15 Million | ▲ +223.4% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $44.18 Million | $176.70 Million | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $23.04 Million | $154.30 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2020 | 3.59x | $538.80 Million | $150.21 Million | ▲ +885.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $166.80 Million | $458.46 Million | ▲ +473.6% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $55.57 Million | $876.04 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $144.06 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +308.6% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $39.52 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $36.56 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +146.4% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-113.67 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-27.94 Million | $942.97 Million | ▼ -183.1% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $25.27 Million | $708.85 Million | ▲ +1693.5% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $1.10 Million | $553.50 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-59.30 Million | $485.60 Million | ▼ -175.2% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $51.40 Million | $316.70 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2008 | 0.55x | $118.20 Million | $215.20 Million | ▲ +219.3% |
| 2007 | -0.46x | $-210.90 Million | $458.20 Million | ▼ -206.2% |
| 2006 | -0.15x | $-49.00 Million | $326.00 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2005 | -0.53x | $-118.20 Million | $221.70 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2004 | -2.94x | $-433.90 Million | $147.40 Million | — |