Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($304.75 Million) in one year. Check Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (2004–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund from 2004 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund across 22 annual periods. Check Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2004–2025)
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2004 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fu cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $35.72 Million | $304.75 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $12.52 Million | $130.17 Million | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2023 | 0.81x | $90.68 Million | $112.15 Million | ▲ +223.4% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $44.18 Million | $176.70 Million | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $23.04 Million | $154.30 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2020 | 3.59x | $538.80 Million | $150.21 Million | ▲ +885.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $166.80 Million | $458.46 Million | ▲ +473.6% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $55.57 Million | $876.04 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $144.06 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +308.6% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $39.52 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $36.56 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +146.4% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-113.67 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-27.94 Million | $942.97 Million | ▼ -183.1% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $25.27 Million | $708.85 Million | ▲ +1693.5% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $1.10 Million | $553.50 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-59.30 Million | $485.60 Million | ▼ -175.2% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $51.40 Million | $316.70 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2008 | 0.55x | $118.20 Million | $215.20 Million | ▲ +219.3% |
| 2007 | -0.46x | $-210.90 Million | $458.20 Million | ▼ -206.2% |
| 2006 | -0.15x | $-49.00 Million | $326.00 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2005 | -0.53x | $-118.20 Million | $221.70 Million | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2004 | -2.94x | $-433.90 Million | $147.40 Million | — |