UMH Properties Inc (UMH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
UMH Properties Inc (UMH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($703.12 Million) in one year. See UMH FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
UMH Properties Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for UMH Properties Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore UMH Properties Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for UMH Properties Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for UMH Properties Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see UMH Properties Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.13x | $81.60 Million | $647.82 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $120.08 Million | $720.78 Million | ▲ +1755.7% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-7.98 Million | $793.40 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $65.16 Million | $528.68 Million | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $69.04 Million | $585.41 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $38.52 Million | $479.11 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $40.18 Million | $454.29 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $41.34 Million | $402.67 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $29.35 Million | $363.41 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $25.71 Million | $357.79 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $24.33 Million | $269.44 Million | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $11.24 Million | $217.39 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $9.09 Million | $125.30 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $8.41 Million | $118.07 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $6.48 Million | $116.85 Million | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $11.36 Million | $92.00 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $8.27 Million | $93.22 Million | ▲ +164.5% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $2.77 Million | $82.51 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $4.16 Million | $58.10 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $3.03 Million | $59.94 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $5.12 Million | $54.36 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $4.42 Million | $55.21 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $6.75 Million | $59.29 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $4.28 Million | $52.37 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $7.17 Million | $40.11 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $6.80 Million | $37.20 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $6.60 Million | $26.80 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 1997 | 0.28x | $6.30 Million | $22.80 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | $5.80 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 1995 | 0.24x | $4.60 Million | $19.50 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 1994 | 0.24x | $4.30 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 1993 | 0.19x | $3.60 Million | $19.00 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 1992 | 0.11x | $2.30 Million | $21.40 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 1991 | 0.09x | $2.10 Million | $23.10 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1990 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $22.60 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $22.10 Million | — |