USANA Health Sciences Inc (USNA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
USANA Health Sciences Inc (USNA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($144.18 Million) in one year. See USNA financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
USANA Health Sciences Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for USANA Health Sciences Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see USNA cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for USANA Health Sciences Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for USANA Health Sciences Inc. Check USNA cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | $22.35 Million | $156.64 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2024 | 0.38x | $60.99 Million | $161.86 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2023 | 0.52x | $70.64 Million | $135.56 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2022 | 0.64x | $103.90 Million | $162.08 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2021 | 0.66x | $121.23 Million | $182.62 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2020 | 0.81x | $160.40 Million | $199.24 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2019 | 0.77x | $126.73 Million | $165.22 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2018 | 0.93x | $152.12 Million | $163.32 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2017 | 0.79x | $123.78 Million | $156.06 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2016 | 0.94x | $137.03 Million | $145.35 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2015 | 0.78x | $111.47 Million | $142.38 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2014 | 0.87x | $105.19 Million | $120.42 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2013 | 0.92x | $98.89 Million | $107.95 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2012 | 1.13x | $92.81 Million | $81.78 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2011 | 0.99x | $70.11 Million | $70.59 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2010 | 1.13x | $66.11 Million | $58.64 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2009 | 0.66x | $32.47 Million | $49.06 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | $45.96 Million | $90.74 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2007 | 0.81x | $57.22 Million | $70.49 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2006 | 1.52x | $60.52 Million | $39.80 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2005 | 1.72x | $48.02 Million | $27.97 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2004 | 1.60x | $38.18 Million | $23.82 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2003 | 1.71x | $35.48 Million | $20.76 Million | ▲ +125.4% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $15.94 Million | $21.02 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | $9.95 Million | $20.83 Million | ▲ +165.7% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $4.07 Million | $22.62 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 1999 | 0.63x | $15.00 Million | $23.90 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 1998 | 1.13x | $10.60 Million | $9.40 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 1997 | 1.00x | $7.10 Million | $7.10 Million | ▲ +107.1% |
| 1996 | 0.48x | $4.20 Million | $8.70 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 1995 | 1.08x | $3.90 Million | $3.60 Million | — |