Essential Utilities Inc (WTRG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Essential Utilities Inc (WTRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $232.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.08 Billion) in one year. See Essential Utilities Inc (WTRG) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Essential Utilities Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Essential Utilities Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore WTRG net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Essential Utilities Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Essential Utilities Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see WTRG stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | $770.34 Million | $11.83 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $933.59 Million | $10.95 Billion | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $600.31 Million | $10.34 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $644.68 Million | $9.47 Billion | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $508.02 Million | $9.02 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $338.52 Million | $5.48 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $368.52 Million | $4.96 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $381.32 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $395.79 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▼ -0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $370.79 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $363.79 Million | $3.75 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $367.82 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $368.41 Million | $3.47 Billion | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $366.85 Million | $3.10 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $263.84 Million | $2.90 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $258.59 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $221.51 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $194.17 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $170.73 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $199.67 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $173.60 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $143.37 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $121.56 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $102.17 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $86.97 Million | $981.66 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $74.10 Million | $911.90 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $55.20 Million | $466.70 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $41.80 Million | $423.80 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $37.60 Million | $402.90 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $32.80 Million | $361.10 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $29.20 Million | $314.40 Million | — |