Wolverine World Wide Inc (WWW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Wolverine World Wide Inc (WWW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-83.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.21 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Wolverine World Wide Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Wolverine World Wide Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Wolverine World Wide Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore WWW total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Wolverine World Wide Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Wolverine World Wide Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Wolverine World Wide Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $136.10 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $180.10 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $121.80 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▲ +183.2% |
| 2022 | -0.08x | $-178.90 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -285.8% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $86.80 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -77.4% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $309.10 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $222.60 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $97.50 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $202.70 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $296.30 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $215.50 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $314.60 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $202.30 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $91.64 Million | $1.97 Billion | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $78.81 Million | $273.99 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $66.25 Million | $238.93 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2009 | 0.75x | $168.61 Million | $225.90 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2008 | 0.40x | $93.47 Million | $234.86 Million | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2007 | 0.77x | $123.29 Million | $159.60 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 2006 | 0.65x | $108.32 Million | $166.53 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2005 | 0.73x | $119.65 Million | $164.26 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2004 | 0.59x | $106.36 Million | $180.71 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2003 | 0.69x | $102.20 Million | $148.47 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2002 | 0.54x | $88.28 Million | $162.75 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $53.94 Million | $169.53 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $70.97 Million | $157.33 Million | ▲ +93.3% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $47.20 Million | $202.30 Million | ▲ +1246.9% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-4.50 Million | $221.20 Million | ▼ -1601.7% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $-200.00K | $167.30 Million | ▼ -101.0% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | $14.90 Million | $122.30 Million | ▲ +591.0% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $1.40 Million | $79.40 Million | ▼ -86.1% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $12.40 Million | $97.70 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $6.00 Million | $92.90 Million | ▲ +97.2% |
| 1992 | 0.03x | $3.20 Million | $97.70 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $10.50 Million | $82.20 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 1990 | 0.17x | $12.40 Million | $73.20 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 1989 | 0.17x | $12.40 Million | $74.10 Million | — |