Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA (AUGR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2024: 0.02x

Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA (AUGR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of €291.26K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€12.18 Million) in one year. See Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

€291.26K
EUR

Total Liabilities

€12.18 Million
EUR

Data as of

Dec 2024
Most recent filing

Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2006–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA across 17 annual periods. Also explore Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA (2006–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Augros Cosmetic Packaging SA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AUGR market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (EUR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.01x €84.39K €12.18 Million ▼ -24.0%
2023 0.01x €110.60K €12.13 Million ▼ -96.5%
2022 0.26x €2.67 Million €10.26 Million ▲ +658.8%
2021 -0.05x €-375.61K €8.07 Million ▼ -217.2%
2020 0.04x €418.19K €10.53 Million ▼ -79.3%
2019 0.19x €1.28 Million €6.69 Million ▲ +84.1%
2018 0.10x €664.82K €6.37 Million ▼ -24.0%
2017 0.14x €964.00K €7.02 Million ▲ +133.6%
2016 0.06x €350.57K €5.97 Million ▼ -35.8%
2015 0.09x €964.00K €10.53 Million ▲ +207.2%
2012 0.03x €360.00K €12.08 Million ▼ -76.9%
2011 0.13x €1.47 Million €11.35 Million ▲ +123.6%
2010 0.06x €737.00K €12.77 Million ▲ +642.7%
2009 0.01x €116.00K €14.93 Million ▼ -86.5%
2008 0.06x €955.00K €16.61 Million ▲ +918.4%
2007 -0.01x €-123.00K €17.51 Million ▼ -101.0%
2006 0.69x €15.08 Million €21.93 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.