Crosswood (CROS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: -0.11x

Crosswood (CROS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of €-1.74 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€16.46 Million) in one year. See CROS FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.11x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

€-1.74 Million
EUR

Total Liabilities

€16.46 Million
EUR

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Crosswood Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Crosswood across 19 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Crosswood growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Crosswood (2007–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Crosswood. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CROS stock market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (EUR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.07x €-1.12 Million €17.16 Million ▼ -156.4%
2024 0.12x €2.04 Million €17.63 Million ▲ +568.4%
2023 0.02x €354.00K €20.48 Million ▲ +180.4%
2022 -0.02x €-477.00K €22.21 Million ▼ -182.9%
2021 0.03x €570.00K €22.00 Million ▲ +47.9%
2020 0.02x €471.00K €26.89 Million ▲ +129.1%
2019 -0.06x €-1.58 Million €26.29 Million ▼ -225.6%
2018 0.05x €1.23 Million €25.51 Million ▲ +216.1%
2017 -0.04x €-1.00 Million €24.29 Million ▼ -128.5%
2016 0.14x €2.92 Million €20.12 Million ▲ +14.6%
2015 0.13x €2.92 Million €23.04 Million ▲ +193.5%
2014 -0.14x €-3.48 Million €25.69 Million ▼ -151.1%
2013 0.26x €9.37 Million €35.45 Million ▲ +384.8%
2012 0.05x €2.37 Million €43.36 Million ▼ -26.6%
2011 0.07x €3.73 Million €50.14 Million ▼ -6.8%
2010 0.08x €4.04 Million €50.71 Million ▲ +23.1%
2009 0.06x €3.14 Million €48.43 Million ▲ +884.9%
2008 -0.01x €-428.00K €51.83 Million ▲ +63.2%
2007 -0.02x €-62.00K €2.76 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.