Bicicletas Monark S.A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bicicletas Monark S.A cash flow-to-debt ratio. Bicicletas Monark S.A (BMKS3) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of R$3.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (R$44.86 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Bicicletas Monark S.A to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Bicicletas Monark S.A (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Bicicletas Monark S.A from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Bicicletas Monark S.A across 26 annual periods. Check BMKS3 cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Bicicletas Monark S.A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Bicicletas Monark S.A cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bicicletas Monark S.A. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Bicicletas Monark S.A.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (BRL) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.49x | R$59.37 Million | R$39.87 Million | ▲ +190.0% |
| 2024 | 0.51x | R$15.40 Million | R$30.00 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2023 | 0.74x | R$24.54 Million | R$33.34 Million | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2022 | 1.29x | R$35.76 Million | R$27.82 Million | ▲ +1804.3% |
| 2021 | -0.08x | R$-1.81 Million | R$24.06 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | R$-1.19 Million | R$26.03 Million | ▼ -164.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | R$2.14 Million | R$30.33 Million | ▲ +126.3% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | R$104.00K | R$3.33 Million | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2017 | 2.22x | R$10.36 Million | R$4.68 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2016 | 1.96x | R$22.06 Million | R$11.27 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2015 | 2.17x | R$12.71 Million | R$5.85 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2014 | 1.60x | R$14.89 Million | R$9.28 Million | ▲ +374.9% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | R$2.60 Million | R$7.70 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | R$10.68 Million | R$36.13 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | R$15.21 Million | R$43.98 Million | ▲ +288.4% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | R$14.34 Million | R$161.06 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2009 | 0.44x | R$13.17 Million | R$30.05 Million | ▲ +286.2% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | R$3.83 Million | R$33.78 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | R$7.47 Million | R$28.23 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2006 | 0.46x | R$12.88 Million | R$27.80 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | R$12.17 Million | R$31.63 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | R$13.89 Million | R$29.69 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | R$14.43 Million | R$34.33 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | R$29.21 Million | R$51.94 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2001 | 0.94x | R$32.39 Million | R$34.36 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2000 | 0.65x | R$18.12 Million | R$27.72 Million | — |