Bicicletas Monark S.A (BMKS3) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bicicletas Monark S.A (BMKS3) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.52x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of R$20.93 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (R$39.87 Million) in one year. See Bicicletas Monark S.A free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bicicletas Monark S.A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bicicletas Monark S.A across 26 annual periods. Also explore BMKS3 net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bicicletas Monark S.A (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bicicletas Monark S.A. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BMKS3 market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (BRL) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.49x | R$59.37 Million | R$39.87 Million | ▲ +190.0% |
| 2024 | 0.51x | R$15.40 Million | R$30.00 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2023 | 0.74x | R$24.54 Million | R$33.34 Million | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2022 | 1.29x | R$35.76 Million | R$27.82 Million | ▲ +1804.3% |
| 2021 | -0.08x | R$-1.81 Million | R$24.06 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | R$-1.19 Million | R$26.03 Million | ▼ -164.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | R$2.14 Million | R$30.33 Million | ▲ +126.3% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | R$104.00K | R$3.33 Million | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2017 | 2.22x | R$10.36 Million | R$4.68 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2016 | 1.96x | R$22.06 Million | R$11.27 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2015 | 2.17x | R$12.71 Million | R$5.85 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2014 | 1.60x | R$14.89 Million | R$9.28 Million | ▲ +374.9% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | R$2.60 Million | R$7.70 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | R$10.68 Million | R$36.13 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | R$15.21 Million | R$43.98 Million | ▲ +288.4% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | R$14.34 Million | R$161.06 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2009 | 0.44x | R$13.17 Million | R$30.05 Million | ▲ +286.2% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | R$3.83 Million | R$33.78 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | R$7.47 Million | R$28.23 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2006 | 0.46x | R$12.88 Million | R$27.80 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | R$12.17 Million | R$31.63 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | R$13.89 Million | R$29.69 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | R$14.43 Million | R$34.33 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2002 | 0.56x | R$29.21 Million | R$51.94 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2001 | 0.94x | R$32.39 Million | R$34.36 Million | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2000 | 0.65x | R$18.12 Million | R$27.72 Million | — |