Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd (000762) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd (000762) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥34.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥3.59 Billion) in one year. Explore Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd (000762) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore 000762 current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Tibet Mineral Development Co Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.10x | CN¥364.96 Million | CN¥3.56 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | CN¥380.36 Million | CN¥4.34 Billion | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2022 | 0.48x | CN¥1.65 Billion | CN¥3.45 Billion | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2021 | 1.41x | CN¥398.07 Million | CN¥283.03 Million | ▲ +641.8% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | CN¥58.96 Million | CN¥310.94 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | CN¥99.16 Million | CN¥401.65 Million | ▲ +263.8% |
| 2018 | -0.15x | CN¥-60.88 Million | CN¥403.94 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2017 | -0.16x | CN¥-84.37 Million | CN¥511.89 Million | ▼ -124.4% |
| 2016 | 0.67x | CN¥278.75 Million | CN¥413.38 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2015 | 0.80x | CN¥306.89 Million | CN¥381.55 Million | ▲ +618.6% |
| 2014 | -0.16x | CN¥-105.01 Million | CN¥677.05 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | CN¥-106.53 Million | CN¥486.11 Million | ▼ -300.6% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | CN¥47.63 Million | CN¥436.06 Million | ▲ +125.2% |
| 2011 | -0.43x | CN¥-154.23 Million | CN¥355.62 Million | ▼ -444.9% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CN¥48.04 Million | CN¥382.04 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | CN¥163.19 Million | CN¥460.37 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | CN¥93.99 Million | CN¥394.70 Million | ▲ +99.7% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | CN¥56.42 Million | CN¥473.20 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | CN¥85.31 Million | CN¥457.83 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | CN¥56.47 Million | CN¥427.04 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | CN¥94.78 Million | CN¥411.14 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | CN¥51.24 Million | CN¥231.95 Million | ▲ +944.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | CN¥4.25 Million | CN¥201.15 Million | ▲ +144.4% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | CN¥-10.10 Million | CN¥211.79 Million | ▲ +76.9% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | CN¥-47.76 Million | CN¥231.59 Million | ▼ -1042.6% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | CN¥-3.88 Million | CN¥215.25 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 1998 | -0.12x | CN¥-14.82 Million | CN¥126.67 Million | — |