Tus-Design Group Co Ltd Class A (300500) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2023: 0.04x

Tus-Design Group Co Ltd Class A (300500) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥84.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥2.13 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Tus-Design Group Co Ltd Class A to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.04x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥84.95 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥2.13 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Jun 2023
Most recent filing

Tus-Design Group Co Ltd Class A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Tus-Design Group Co Ltd Class A across 14 annual periods. Also explore 300500 net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tus-Design Group Co Ltd Class A (2011–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tus-Design Group Co Ltd Class A. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 300500 market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.06x CN¥104.44 Million CN¥1.90 Billion ▼ -61.3%
2023 0.14x CN¥309.21 Million CN¥2.17 Billion ▲ +2269.4%
2022 0.01x CN¥12.58 Million CN¥2.10 Billion ▼ -93.1%
2021 0.09x CN¥157.44 Million CN¥1.81 Billion ▼ -58.8%
2020 0.21x CN¥258.39 Million CN¥1.22 Billion ▲ +54.9%
2019 0.14x CN¥135.39 Million CN¥992.02 Million ▲ +57.5%
2018 0.09x CN¥80.85 Million CN¥932.80 Million ▼ -77.7%
2017 0.39x CN¥85.13 Million CN¥218.69 Million ▼ -16.9%
2016 0.47x CN¥101.56 Million CN¥216.71 Million ▲ +38.4%
2015 0.34x CN¥29.43 Million CN¥86.92 Million ▼ -45.1%
2014 0.62x CN¥47.30 Million CN¥76.67 Million ▼ -31.6%
2013 0.90x CN¥68.67 Million CN¥76.15 Million ▼ -4.9%
2012 0.95x CN¥66.17 Million CN¥69.77 Million ▲ +202.9%
2011 0.31x CN¥16.84 Million CN¥53.78 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.