Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd (600616) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd (600616) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥7.24 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥236.92 Million) in one year. Explore Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd (600616) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Shanghai Jinfeng Wine Co Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | CN¥74.02 Million | CN¥317.35 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | CN¥79.26 Million | CN¥308.72 Million | ▲ +2831.8% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CN¥-3.23 Million | CN¥344.12 Million | ▼ -103.4% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | CN¥102.05 Million | CN¥365.87 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CN¥68.12 Million | CN¥358.75 Million | ▲ +322.7% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | CN¥-27.19 Million | CN¥318.97 Million | ▼ -132.9% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CN¥102.04 Million | CN¥393.26 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CN¥49.51 Million | CN¥356.16 Million | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | CN¥113.49 Million | CN¥357.76 Million | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | CN¥123.78 Million | CN¥443.25 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | CN¥160.43 Million | CN¥493.67 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | CN¥84.43 Million | CN¥284.20 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2013 | 0.53x | CN¥140.11 Million | CN¥265.66 Million | ▲ +113.5% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | CN¥97.33 Million | CN¥394.07 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2011 | 0.41x | CN¥118.27 Million | CN¥288.01 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2010 | 0.58x | CN¥169.06 Million | CN¥289.13 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2009 | 1.07x | CN¥176.04 Million | CN¥164.10 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2008 | 0.57x | CN¥172.62 Million | CN¥301.77 Million | ▲ +351.2% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | CN¥226.64 Million | CN¥1.79 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | CN¥206.00 Million | CN¥1.50 Billion | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | CN¥158.13 Million | CN¥1.58 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CN¥130.49 Million | CN¥1.47 Billion | ▲ +329.6% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | CN¥-50.16 Million | CN¥1.30 Billion | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2002 | -0.10x | CN¥-87.55 Million | CN¥908.61 Million | ▼ -145.2% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | CN¥50.55 Million | CN¥236.88 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | CN¥35.05 Million | CN¥188.57 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | CN¥29.19 Million | CN¥129.69 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | CN¥29.53 Million | CN¥112.68 Million | — |