Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd (600773) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd (600773) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥-33.11 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥6.23 Billion) in one year. See Tibet Urban Development and Investment C free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore 600773 shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Tibet Urban Development and Investment C.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.05x | CN¥-356.41 Million | CN¥7.18 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CN¥-565.80 Million | CN¥9.83 Billion | ▼ -157.6% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CN¥1.02 Billion | CN¥10.25 Billion | ▲ +510.9% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | CN¥-265.27 Million | CN¥10.92 Billion | ▼ -134.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CN¥774.54 Million | CN¥10.94 Billion | ▲ +102.9% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | CN¥364.67 Million | CN¥10.45 Billion | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CN¥-1.03 Billion | CN¥8.57 Billion | ▼ -615.3% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | CN¥183.13 Million | CN¥7.85 Billion | ▲ +292.9% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | CN¥-79.19 Million | CN¥6.55 Billion | ▼ -108.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | CN¥1.20 Billion | CN¥8.48 Billion | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | CN¥2.17 Billion | CN¥8.41 Billion | ▲ +3541.4% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | CN¥-57.23 Million | CN¥7.62 Billion | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | CN¥-470.59 Million | CN¥7.46 Billion | ▼ -785.6% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | CN¥-50.98 Million | CN¥7.15 Billion | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2010 | -0.34x | CN¥-2.67 Billion | CN¥7.94 Billion | ▼ -170.2% |
| 2009 | -0.12x | CN¥-518.68 Million | CN¥4.17 Billion | ▼ -287.7% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CN¥5.09 Million | CN¥76.77 Million | ▲ +228.8% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | CN¥-5.16 Million | CN¥100.19 Million | ▼ -337.5% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CN¥-892.61K | CN¥75.83 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | CN¥-26.20 Million | CN¥683.45 Million | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | CN¥-181.51 Million | CN¥642.35 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | CN¥-195.62 Million | CN¥690.83 Million | ▼ -308.2% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | CN¥30.77 Million | CN¥226.26 Million | ▲ +135.1% |
| 2001 | -0.39x | CN¥-72.56 Million | CN¥187.39 Million | ▼ -259.7% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | CN¥15.57 Million | CN¥64.21 Million | ▼ -41.2% |
| 1999 | 0.41x | CN¥13.52 Million | CN¥32.77 Million | ▲ +2318.3% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | CN¥-410.59K | CN¥22.08 Million | — |