Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd (600773) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd (600773) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥-33.11 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥6.23 Billion) in one year. See Tibet Urban Development and Investment C financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tibet Urban Development and Investment C cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd. Check cash flow quality index of Tibet Urban Development and Investment C to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.05x | CN¥-356.41 Million | CN¥7.18 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CN¥-565.80 Million | CN¥9.83 Billion | ▼ -157.6% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CN¥1.02 Billion | CN¥10.25 Billion | ▲ +510.9% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | CN¥-265.27 Million | CN¥10.92 Billion | ▼ -134.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CN¥774.54 Million | CN¥10.94 Billion | ▲ +102.9% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | CN¥364.67 Million | CN¥10.45 Billion | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CN¥-1.03 Billion | CN¥8.57 Billion | ▼ -615.3% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | CN¥183.13 Million | CN¥7.85 Billion | ▲ +292.9% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | CN¥-79.19 Million | CN¥6.55 Billion | ▼ -108.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | CN¥1.20 Billion | CN¥8.48 Billion | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | CN¥2.17 Billion | CN¥8.41 Billion | ▲ +3541.4% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | CN¥-57.23 Million | CN¥7.62 Billion | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | CN¥-470.59 Million | CN¥7.46 Billion | ▼ -785.6% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | CN¥-50.98 Million | CN¥7.15 Billion | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2010 | -0.34x | CN¥-2.67 Billion | CN¥7.94 Billion | ▼ -170.2% |
| 2009 | -0.12x | CN¥-518.68 Million | CN¥4.17 Billion | ▼ -287.7% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CN¥5.09 Million | CN¥76.77 Million | ▲ +228.8% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | CN¥-5.16 Million | CN¥100.19 Million | ▼ -337.5% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CN¥-892.61K | CN¥75.83 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | CN¥-26.20 Million | CN¥683.45 Million | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | CN¥-181.51 Million | CN¥642.35 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | CN¥-195.62 Million | CN¥690.83 Million | ▼ -308.2% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | CN¥30.77 Million | CN¥226.26 Million | ▲ +135.1% |
| 2001 | -0.39x | CN¥-72.56 Million | CN¥187.39 Million | ▼ -259.7% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | CN¥15.57 Million | CN¥64.21 Million | ▼ -41.2% |
| 1999 | 0.41x | CN¥13.52 Million | CN¥32.77 Million | ▲ +2318.3% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | CN¥-410.59K | CN¥22.08 Million | — |