Seazen Holdings Co Ltd (601155) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.00x

Seazen Holdings Co Ltd (601155) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥213.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥210.48 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Seazen Holdings Co Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥213.64 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥210.48 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Seazen Holdings Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Seazen Holdings Co Ltd across 14 annual periods. Also explore 601155 net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Seazen Holdings Co Ltd (2011–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Seazen Holdings Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Seazen Holdings Co Ltd worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.01x CN¥-2.64 Billion CN¥222.34 Billion ▼ -156.7%
2023 0.02x CN¥6.00 Billion CN¥286.58 Billion ▼ -46.7%
2022 0.04x CN¥14.53 Billion CN¥370.46 Billion ▲ +11.4%
2021 0.04x CN¥15.60 Billion CN¥442.69 Billion ▲ +346.2%
2020 -0.01x CN¥-6.63 Billion CN¥463.02 Billion ▼ -115.6%
2019 0.09x CN¥37.66 Billion CN¥410.43 Billion ▲ +8222.5%
2018 0.00x CN¥320.94 Million CN¥291.13 Billion ▲ +101.3%
2017 -0.08x CN¥-13.58 Billion CN¥164.77 Billion ▼ -232.6%
2016 0.06x CN¥5.58 Billion CN¥89.70 Billion ▲ +250.0%
2015 -0.04x CN¥-2.38 Billion CN¥57.36 Billion ▼ -169.3%
2014 0.06x CN¥2.47 Billion CN¥41.29 Billion ▲ +167.0%
2013 -0.09x CN¥-3.27 Billion CN¥36.60 Billion ▼ -372.7%
2012 0.03x CN¥1.06 Billion CN¥32.45 Billion ▲ +209.2%
2011 -0.03x CN¥-950.58 Million CN¥31.70 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.