Raisecom Technology Co Ltd (603803) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.01x

Raisecom Technology Co Ltd (603803) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥-6.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥901.97 Million) in one year. See 603803 financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥-6.58 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥901.97 Million
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Raisecom Technology Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Raisecom Technology Co Ltd across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 603803 cash generation efficiency.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Raisecom Technology Co Ltd (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Raisecom Technology Co Ltd. Check cash flow quality index of Raisecom Technology Co Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.13x CN¥-101.64 Million CN¥770.77 Million ▼ -739.1%
2024 0.02x CN¥21.88 Million CN¥1.06 Billion ▼ -91.9%
2023 0.26x CN¥314.00 Million CN¥1.23 Billion ▲ +243.8%
2022 0.07x CN¥113.30 Million CN¥1.52 Billion ▲ +230.1%
2021 -0.06x CN¥-74.12 Million CN¥1.29 Billion ▼ -1690.8%
2020 0.00x CN¥3.60 Million CN¥1.00 Billion ▼ -97.5%
2019 0.14x CN¥181.35 Million CN¥1.28 Billion ▲ +214.8%
2018 0.05x CN¥63.39 Million CN¥1.41 Billion ▲ +173.7%
2017 -0.06x CN¥-66.94 Million CN¥1.09 Billion ▼ -158.8%
2016 0.10x CN¥124.58 Million CN¥1.20 Billion ▲ +41.7%
2015 0.07x CN¥75.82 Million CN¥1.03 Billion ▼ -58.9%
2014 0.18x CN¥160.88 Million CN¥901.61 Million ▼ -6.1%
2013 0.19x CN¥145.44 Million CN¥765.41 Million ▲ +4.8%
2012 0.18x CN¥117.56 Million CN¥648.20 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.