Jason Furniture(Hangzhou) (603816) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.11x

Jason Furniture(Hangzhou) (603816) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥764.99 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥7.02 Billion) in one year. See 603816 free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.11x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥764.99 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥7.02 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Jason Furniture(Hangzhou) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Jason Furniture(Hangzhou) across 15 annual periods. Also explore Jason Furniture(Hangzhou) (603816) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jason Furniture(Hangzhou) (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jason Furniture(Hangzhou). For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 603816 company net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.34x CN¥2.77 Billion CN¥8.14 Billion ▼ -5.8%
2024 0.36x CN¥2.68 Billion CN¥7.41 Billion ▲ +0.5%
2023 0.36x CN¥2.52 Billion CN¥6.99 Billion ▲ +5.1%
2022 0.34x CN¥2.41 Billion CN¥7.03 Billion ▲ +26.5%
2021 0.27x CN¥2.04 Billion CN¥7.54 Billion ▼ -26.3%
2020 0.37x CN¥2.18 Billion CN¥5.93 Billion ▲ +3.1%
2019 0.36x CN¥2.12 Billion CN¥5.96 Billion ▲ +93.8%
2018 0.18x CN¥1.01 Billion CN¥5.49 Billion ▼ -59.0%
2017 0.45x CN¥1.14 Billion CN¥2.53 Billion ▼ -18.6%
2016 0.55x CN¥974.60 Million CN¥1.77 Billion ▼ -3.6%
2015 0.57x CN¥762.09 Million CN¥1.33 Billion ▲ +165.2%
2014 0.22x CN¥228.50 Million CN¥1.06 Billion ▼ -65.4%
2013 0.62x CN¥454.53 Million CN¥730.51 Million ▲ +25.0%
2012 0.50x CN¥329.92 Million CN¥662.66 Million ▼ -8.2%
2011 0.54x CN¥374.46 Million CN¥690.65 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.