Railway Signal Communication Ltd (688009) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.01x

Railway Signal Communication Ltd (688009) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥632.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥67.23 Billion) in one year. See 688009 FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥632.72 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥67.23 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Railway Signal Communication Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Railway Signal Communication Ltd across 13 annual periods. Also explore Railway Signal Communication Ltd (688009) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Railway Signal Communication Ltd (2012–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Railway Signal Communication Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Railway Signal Communication Ltd market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.08x CN¥5.24 Billion CN¥67.46 Billion ▲ +164.5%
2023 0.03x CN¥2.06 Billion CN¥70.12 Billion ▼ -2.0%
2022 0.03x CN¥2.08 Billion CN¥69.53 Billion ▼ -31.2%
2021 0.04x CN¥2.77 Billion CN¥63.57 Billion ▼ -11.6%
2020 0.05x CN¥3.01 Billion CN¥61.03 Billion ▼ -19.9%
2019 0.06x CN¥3.37 Billion CN¥54.79 Billion ▲ +291.7%
2018 -0.03x CN¥-1.59 Billion CN¥49.41 Billion ▼ -30.5%
2017 -0.02x CN¥-886.02 Million CN¥36.02 Billion ▼ -123.1%
2016 0.11x CN¥2.94 Billion CN¥27.60 Billion ▼ -14.4%
2015 0.12x CN¥2.76 Billion CN¥22.26 Billion ▲ +67.9%
2014 0.07x CN¥1.19 Billion CN¥16.10 Billion ▼ -45.7%
2013 0.14x CN¥1.59 Billion CN¥11.65 Billion ▲ +86.1%
2012 0.07x CN¥690.60 Million CN¥9.44 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.