HNA Technology Co Ltd B (900938) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
HNA Technology Co Ltd B (900938) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-65.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.82 Billion) in one year. See HNA Technology Co Ltd B (900938) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
HNA Technology Co Ltd B Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for HNA Technology Co Ltd B across 27 annual periods. Also explore HNA Technology Co Ltd B annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for HNA Technology Co Ltd B (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for HNA Technology Co Ltd B. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of HNA Technology Co Ltd B.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.40x | $-464.17 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2023 | -1.56x | $-2.32 Billion | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -6431.1% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | $-84.29 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2021 | -0.64x | $-3.05 Billion | $4.74 Billion | ▼ -505.6% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $18.22 Billion | $114.92 Billion | ▲ +353.5% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $3.80 Billion | $108.84 Billion | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $3.07 Billion | $111.04 Billion | ▲ +160.3% |
| 2017 | -0.05x | $-4.81 Billion | $104.97 Billion | ▼ -376.9% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $1.67 Billion | $100.90 Billion | ▲ +123.0% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | $-40.04 Million | $556.39 Million | ▼ -138.3% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $128.74 Million | $685.54 Million | ▼ -63.4% |
| 2013 | 0.51x | $147.88 Million | $287.89 Million | ▲ +749.6% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $28.05 Million | $463.92 Million | ▲ +400.1% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-22.25 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2010 | -0.18x | $-213.51 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2009 | -0.09x | $-89.27 Million | $969.15 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2008 | -0.10x | $-80.42 Million | $769.87 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2007 | -0.08x | $-61.24 Million | $744.62 Million | ▼ -171.8% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $102.45 Million | $894.59 Million | ▲ +458.4% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $15.46 Million | $753.80 Million | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $132.64 Million | $908.95 Million | ▲ +576.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-30.17 Million | $984.56 Million | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2002 | -0.10x | $-98.09 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -302.3% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $40.40 Million | $847.30 Million | ▲ +176.7% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | $-47.57 Million | $764.89 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $105.39 Million | $615.81 Million | ▲ +1581.1% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $7.24 Million | $711.53 Million | — |