Alfa Laval AB Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alfa Laval AB cash flow-to-debt ratio. Alfa Laval AB (ALFA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr2.41 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr58.89 Billion) in one year. Check Alfa Laval AB (ALFA) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Alfa Laval AB (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Alfa Laval AB from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Alfa Laval AB across 26 annual periods. Check Alfa Laval AB (ALFA) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Alfa Laval AB Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Alfa Laval AB cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alfa Laval AB. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ALFA cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | Skr8.82 Billion | Skr54.41 Billion | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | Skr12.16 Billion | Skr46.52 Billion | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | Skr9.17 Billion | Skr44.91 Billion | ▲ +182.5% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | Skr3.29 Billion | Skr45.55 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | Skr5.26 Billion | Skr32.02 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | Skr7.72 Billion | Skr31.79 Billion | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | Skr5.22 Billion | Skr36.65 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | Skr4.88 Billion | Skr34.47 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | Skr4.46 Billion | Skr32.05 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | Skr4.98 Billion | Skr33.10 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | Skr5.85 Billion | Skr33.47 Billion | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | Skr5.12 Billion | Skr38.58 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | Skr4.23 Billion | Skr18.78 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | Skr3.59 Billion | Skr19.69 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | Skr3.43 Billion | Skr19.36 Billion | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | Skr4.10 Billion | Skr13.59 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr13.98 Billion | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | Skr4.06 Billion | Skr18.54 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2007 | 0.21x | Skr3.26 Billion | Skr15.31 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | Skr2.62 Billion | Skr11.92 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | Skr1.62 Billion | Skr10.39 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | Skr1.20 Billion | Skr8.81 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | Skr1.65 Billion | Skr9.69 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | Skr1.92 Billion | Skr10.81 Billion | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | Skr2.00 Billion | Skr16.05 Billion | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | Skr1.63 Billion | Skr17.31 Billion | — |