Enzymatica publ AB (ENZY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.85x

Enzymatica publ AB (ENZY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.85x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr-11.57 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (Skr13.56 Million) in one year. Explore Enzymatica publ AB long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.85x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Skr-11.57 Million
SEK

Total Liabilities

Skr13.56 Million
SEK

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Enzymatica publ AB Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Enzymatica publ AB across 15 annual periods. Also explore ENZY current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enzymatica publ AB (2009–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enzymatica publ AB. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ENZY market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (SEK) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -3.21x Skr-60.51 Million Skr18.86 Million ▼ -292.7%
2023 -0.82x Skr-40.29 Million Skr49.30 Million ▲ +39.1%
2022 -1.34x Skr-64.57 Million Skr48.12 Million ▼ -20.0%
2021 -1.12x Skr-35.87 Million Skr32.07 Million ▼ -481.5%
2020 -0.19x Skr-10.65 Million Skr55.38 Million ▲ +85.4%
2019 -1.32x Skr-37.58 Million Skr28.51 Million ▼ -16.8%
2018 -1.13x Skr-28.79 Million Skr25.51 Million ▼ -15.8%
2017 -0.97x Skr-22.55 Million Skr23.12 Million ▲ +47.7%
2016 -1.87x Skr-38.43 Million Skr20.60 Million ▼ -8.4%
2015 -1.72x Skr-37.65 Million Skr21.87 Million ▲ +58.8%
2014 -4.17x Skr-40.67 Million Skr9.74 Million ▼ -133.1%
2013 -1.79x Skr-18.43 Million Skr10.29 Million ▲ +51.5%
2012 -3.69x Skr-7.25 Million Skr1.96 Million ▼ -1.2%
2011 -3.65x Skr-4.86 Million Skr1.33 Million ▼ -7501.7%
2009 -0.05x Skr-101.99K Skr2.12 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.