Abra Information Technologies Ltd (BBYL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2020: 0.08x

Abra Information Technologies Ltd (BBYL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2020, meaning its operating cash flow of ILA1.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ILA23.47 Million) in one year. See BBYL free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.08x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

ILA1.92 Million
ILA

Total Liabilities

ILA23.47 Million
ILA

Data as of

Sep 2020
Most recent filing

Abra Information Technologies Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2019)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Abra Information Technologies Ltd across 13 annual periods. Also explore Abra Information Technologies Ltd equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Abra Information Technologies Ltd (2007–2019)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Abra Information Technologies Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Abra Information Technologies Ltd.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (ILA) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2019 4.91x ILA11.03 Million ILA2.25 Million ▲ +620.4%
2018 0.68x ILA9.90 Million ILA14.53 Million ▲ +149.3%
2017 0.27x ILA764.00K ILA2.80 Million ▼ -81.1%
2016 1.45x ILA6.17 Million ILA4.26 Million ▼ -57.3%
2015 3.39x ILA21.09 Million ILA6.22 Million ▼ -45.5%
2014 6.23x ILA56.36 Million ILA9.05 Million ▲ +24.6%
2013 5.00x ILA158.21 Million ILA31.65 Million ▲ +268.8%
2012 1.36x ILA120.81 Million ILA89.11 Million ▲ +96.5%
2011 0.69x ILA7.59 Million ILA11.00 Million ▼ -55.9%
2010 1.57x ILA23.48 Million ILA15.00 Million ▲ +127.6%
2009 0.69x ILA9.43 Million ILA13.71 Million ▼ -6.2%
2008 0.73x ILA9.62 Million ILA13.12 Million ▲ +413.7%
2007 0.14x ILA2.08 Million ILA14.60 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.