Hamama Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2023: 0.21x

Hamama cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hamama (HMAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of June 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of ILA19.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ILA90.09 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Hamama to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.21x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

ILA19.20 Million
ILA

Total Liabilities

ILA90.09 Million
ILA

Data as of

Jun 2023
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hamama (2009–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hamama from 2009 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hamama across 14 annual periods. Check Hamama (HMAM) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Hamama Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2009–2024)

Hamama cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2009 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hamama. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hamama cash conversion from operations.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (ILA) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.35x ILA27.59 Million ILA79.73 Million ▼ -36.1%
2023 0.54x ILA47.97 Million ILA88.64 Million ▲ +371.5%
2022 -0.20x ILA-28.73 Million ILA144.13 Million ▼ -199.3%
2021 0.20x ILA24.21 Million ILA120.68 Million ▼ -30.6%
2020 0.29x ILA34.27 Million ILA118.59 Million ▲ +48.5%
2019 0.19x ILA26.57 Million ILA136.54 Million ▲ +34.6%
2018 0.14x ILA21.72 Million ILA150.20 Million ▼ -34.4%
2017 0.22x ILA39.63 Million ILA179.68 Million ▲ +298.8%
2016 0.06x ILA12.28 Million ILA222.03 Million ▼ -65.7%
2015 0.16x ILA39.28 Million ILA243.44 Million ▲ +312.9%
2014 -0.08x ILA-23.18 Million ILA305.88 Million ▼ -1235.7%
2013 0.01x ILA1.72 Million ILA258.22 Million ▼ -89.1%
2011 0.06x ILA13.48 Million ILA220.85 Million ▼ -16.0%
2009 0.07x ILA15.16 Million ILA208.64 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.